Back to @realChainDoctor's profile

ChainDoctor engagement report

@realChainDoctor - 86K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.046%
of 86K followers
Per impression
0.556%
7.1K views on a typical post
Reach
8.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
40
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 86K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 3,918 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 0.556% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ChainDoctor's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,918 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 3 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.046%, ChainDoctor sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,996 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,714 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 202625x their median

    最近这个视频截图到处传,原来原版在这里。 https://t.co/yT8W2Y1cd8

    736671989286K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202620x their median

    Lets do this again then https://t.co/BvHnPjfw3M

    644537348136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202619x their median

    景甜应该没看过《小岛经济学》。 她对交易的理解,还停留在最朴素的即时交换:钱给了,关系发生了,交易结束了。 但孙宇晨是币圈人,他理解的显然是另一套东西。今天付出去的钱,本质上是在给未来的关系、承诺和预期定价。 一个以为是现货交割,一个以为买的是远期合约。 所以在孙宇晨的版本里,当5000万美元这个数字出现时,他跑去问Claude该不该给,其实特别合理。 AI不懂爱情,但是AI懂风控。 人会因为感情、沉没成本和承诺继续加仓,AI不会。AI就是一个没有感情的决策机器人,只看风险收益比,然后告诉你:别给。 孙哥用实际行动告诉大家,沉没成本不参与重大决策。

    6196255493K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20269.1x their median

    我最近打算gap一段时间,度过我的奥德赛时期 作为一个拥有NPD父母的东亚小孩,既要修补原生家庭留下的心脉损伤,还要调理下常年摆烂造成的前额叶受损 现在赶上经济下行,又撞上AI风口,天生高敏感体质,搞得皮质醇居高不下,还总在回避型、依恋型人格里反复横跳,时不时还被调侃有ADHD特质 现在只能听一听播客,积累审美,找寻自身主体性,做好课题分离

    231181021337K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20268.8x their median

    要不是我自己投资了一个做跨境的团队,我差点就信了“跨境电商遍地黄金”这套叙事。 这两年真正做跨境的人,体感其实完全不一样。 欧盟税务、关税和合规成本一层层往上加,平台这边佣金、广告费、仓储费、退款、罚款各种扣,账面上看着流水不小,最后真正落袋的钱可能薄得吓人。 更麻烦的是,很多成本不是你卖不卖得动的问题,而是只要你继续做,就必须交的钱。政策一变,利润模型可能直接重算;平台规则一改,原本赚钱的链接第二天就可能变成给平台打工。 所以现在跨境最容易制造的错觉就是:GMV很大,订单很多,看起来生意特别红火。 但做过的人都知道,流水不是利润,利润也不等于最后能拿走的现金。 这行业现在早就不是“找个产品,上架,投广告就赚钱”了,而是在供应链、税务、合规、平台规则、物流和投流成本之间反复抠利润。 外面的人看跨境,是全球市场。 里面的人看跨境,是每个月又多了哪一笔扣款。 这些都不是一个Codex能解决的。

    2372877839K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20268.2x their median

    香港房子的租售比真的很离谱。 一些核心地段的老破小,比如花 1500 万买一套房子,首付一部分几百万,其余的贷款。 房子放租,租金可以抵房贷。 10 年放租就收回了首付,后面房子无压力持有。 关键是,这种核心地段的房子放租非常非常快,发出去一般不用一个礼拜就租完了,可以全部交给中介打理。

    2316892182K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.3x their median

    新周期牛市的主线叙事已经逐渐清晰了: 加密行业正在从资产“发行”大牛转变为全球资产上链后的“分发”大牛! Crypto is moving from an issuance bull market to a distribution bull market, as the world’s assets go onchain.

    961157673K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.8x their median

    基本确定,牛市已经回来了。 这一轮的大仓位,我依旧不会去追那些短期炒作的垃圾叙事,核心仓位还是选择 $BTC $ETH $BNB $HYPE 这种确定性更高的资产。 牛市最重要的不是每天寻找十倍币,而是在大周期里拿住真正吃到资金迁移红利的东西(Beta)。 至于链上机会,我觉得还需要等待新的超级叙事。目前来看,RWA(现实资产上链)大概率会成为本轮的重要方向,尤其是币股、链上股票、传统金融资产代币化这些领域。 这一轮可能炒的是金融基础设施重构。 行情刚开始的时候,市场永远喜欢质疑,等所有人确认牛市回来了,牛市已经到了中后期了。

    1101124527K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.9x their median

    在市场上,有时候需要感谢那些跟你看法不一样的人。

    71141113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.5x their median

    我觉得孙宇晨真不能代表币圈,收购的几个交易所包括火币,根本没几个人真正的币圈人在用,至于波场,也就是跨交易所转账的时候偶尔用一下,但是现在手续费也不低了,基本不用。

    67232022K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 86K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 3,918 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 0.556% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

What is ChainDoctor's engagement rate on X?
ChainDoctor (@realChainDoctor) has an engagement rate of 0.046%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 85,781 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.046%, ChainDoctor sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @realChainDoctor have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,918 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @realChainDoctor post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going