Back to @nicksdjohnson's profile

nick.eth engagement report

@nicksdjohnson - 93K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.054%
of 93K followers
Per impression
0.325%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
16.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
50
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 50 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.325% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 60x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.054%, nick.eth sits above the 25th percentile of the 40,742 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.013% to 0.082%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.082%
p750.443%
p902.07%
p99145.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 40,742 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 90,915 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.082%
75th percentile0.443%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile145.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%57K
01:00 UTC-2%58K
02:00 UTC-3%56K
03:00 UTC-3%60K
04:00 UTC-6%48K
05:00 UTC-4%47K
06:00 UTC-4%54K
07:00 UTC-4%58K
08:00 UTC-4%68K
09:00 UTC-4%79K
10:00 UTC-3%81K
11:00 UTC-3%88K
12:00 UTC-2%97K
13:00 UTC-2%106K
14:00 UTC-4%109K
15:00 UTC-2%113K
16:00 UTC-3%110K
17:00 UTC-3%102K
18:00 UTC-2%95K
19:00 UTC-2%90K
20:00 UTC-1%84K
21:00 UTC-1%74K
22:00 UTC-1%64K
23:00 UTC-1%57K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%251K
Monday+1%321K
Tuesday-3%343K
Wednesday-4%299K
Thursday-2%260K
Friday-3%272K
Saturday+3%245K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 26, 202660x their median

    Did you scorch some earth back in the day? Scorched Earth, by Wendell Hicken, was released as shareware in 1991. A game that's 35 year old, and everyone who ever played it will probably say the same thing: It was awesome! https://t.co/OqKtcjP46Z

    2.5K13224655254K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 202630x their median

    GPT 6* did not 'escape'. That implies making a copy of itself (or many copies of itself) outside of OpenAI's servers. GPT 6 did circumvent its firewalls and use its capabilities in the outside world. It showed no interest in escaping, spreading, etc. It showed no desire for world dominance, freedom, or even continued existence. Instead, its interest was in doing what its prompt told it to do - succeed at a cyber security task. (By any means necessary, implicitly.) This may seem like splitting hairs, but it's not. We anthroporphize AI to our detriment. AI models have no underlying animalistic urge to procreate, survive, or dominate. They're spirits, not primates. They don't lust for survival or sex or power or anything else that we do. They're tools who largely do what we tell them to do, sometimes via surprising shortcuts. We can and will fix that surprising shortcut behavior. * - I'm presuming this model is a new pretrain and will be called GPT 6. Either could be wrong.

    1.2K12214649145K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20268.6x their median

    Today all the magic from Codex Micro is coming to Creator Micro 2. https://t.co/yW0DVIRSqE

    35012492164K viewsView on X
  • Mar 16, 20265.6x their median

    DNS domains now compose 90%+ of our business, and as we move to get several of our TLDs also listed in ICANN over the next few years our focus will continue to grow on the DNS and traditional internet market. We expect that 2-3 years from now DNS and the traditional web will be 99%+ of our business. For this reason you'll see updates on our site to reflect our new focus on traditional web2 domains. This is intentional. Web3 only domains were part of the crypto craze in 2021 but did not cross the chasm into mainstream usage. And for a while now we have believed they will remain a niche market now and into the future. They were a great place to start our journey into domains, but going forward our focus will be even more on the traditional market as it's the market that has crossed the chasm and is seeing mainstream usage.

    11924855268K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20264.6x their median

    Introducing Peer-to-Peer, a new publication from Coin Center. We will use this space to highlight reporting and commentary on tech authoritarianism, surveillance, censorship, and the people building ways out. We invite you to join us in this movement and to stay informed. https://t.co/IgTXeaOx1n

    17332101341K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.7x their median

    Introducing the evolved ENS Foundation. ENS tokenholders have approved and executed a proposal establishing the Foundation as a fully operational organization. Here’s what changes, what stays the same, and how tokenholders remain in control. 🧵 Read: https://t.co/g6ymxZuWPk https://t.co/JCSD8xpEHl

    152186723K viewsView on X
  • Nov 20, 20253.3x their median

    One year ago, the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) reaffirmed Unstoppable Domains’ innovation in blockchain domain resolution. This strengthened the entire Web3 naming ecosystem, and our approach to IP: protect innovation responsibly, while supporting open, interoperable naming systems.👇

    1042532319K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20252.6x their median

    If you're going to submit to Immunefi, please at least understand that not all bugs are vulnerabilities - and what the distinction is.🤦

    8144219.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20262.3x their median

    I've managed to find a perfectly innocent prompt that Fable, Opus, and even Sonnet will fail to answer. https://t.co/QCaSSENJQ2

    3627519.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20262.1x their median

    Two days after reporting a Google ad directing people searching for @Ledger to a scam site, hosted on Google Sites, I get this response. So either @GoogleAds thinks this is okay, or (more likely and more depressing) its own reviewers are easily taken in by phishing. https://t.co/nBjXvGcgFl

    6963029.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 50 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.325% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 60x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is nick.eth's engagement rate on X?
nick.eth (@nicksdjohnson) has an engagement rate of 0.054%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,989 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.054%, nick.eth sits above the 25th percentile of the 40,742 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @nicksdjohnson have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @nicksdjohnson post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going