Back to @duty2warn's profile

Duty To Warn πŸ”‰ engagement report

@duty2warn - 430K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.935%
of 430K followers
Per impression
10.7%
38K views on a typical post
Reach
8.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.163%
62 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 430K followers, an engagement rate of 0.935%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 10.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 101K interactions, about 25x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.935%, Duty To Warn πŸ”‰ sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.438% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Apr 14, 202625x their median

    THIS IS ULTRA SAVAGE πŸ”₯ Journalist –– Why do you think President Trump posted that photo depicting Jesus? πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Rep Nancy –– "You should ask a psychiatrist. It needs diagnosis, not conversation" πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/Xhq3TwcZqA

    84K15K7943441.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 202613x their median

    Holy shit, this sick old man can't even keep himself upright, seated in the Oval Office. He's practically sideways. How TF is this not a bigger story? https://t.co/6o3bXtprdp

    34K13K2.9K856617K viewsView on X
  • May 8, 202612x their median

    NEW: MAGA evangelical leaders gather in Mar-a-Lago to bless and dedicate a gold statue dedicate to Donald Trump. https://t.co/D3HcomQIu3

    20K4.9K12K10.0K28M viewsView on X
  • Apr 13, 20265.6x their median

    Q: Did you post that picture of yourself depicted as Jesus Christ? TRUMP: I did post it and I thought it was me as a doctor and had to do Red Cross. Only the fake news could come up with that one. https://t.co/z5tPuqSvA7

    14K2.6K3.5K2.1K3.1M viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 20265.2x their median

    OPINION: Imagine it was someone other than President Donald Trump. Suppose a different leader were posting deranged rants in the small hours, insulting the spiritual leader of 1.3 billion Catholics, threatening entire civilizations with annihilation, and comparing himself to God. What would be the reaction? MORE: https://t.co/AXUW788gkG

    15K4.1K1.3K3833.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20253.0x their median

    Trump's obvious neurological decay is the new Big Lie, and the mainstream media needs to stop being complicit. The random garbling we saw and heard from him yesterday was not early stage, it was an advanced degenerative neurological disorder that's beyond disturbing. MSM: don't sugar coat or normalize this - be like Lawrence O'Donnell, who said this last night: "There's this character named Donald Trump, with orange-colored skin and big hair, who shows up to all these events, sometimes he's asked questions, and words come out of his mouth. But he's not there. His mind ... is gone."

    8.8K2.9K383134361K viewsView on X
  • Apr 13, 20261.9x their median

    The NYT is finally reporting on Trump’s mental state, just 10 years late https://t.co/JoJ2Wm1uqA

    5.3K2.3K875785K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.8x their median

    How is possible for a man to fail at virtually everything he has ever done in his entire life, yet succeed at breaking the reputation of the strongest nation in human history?

    5.6K1.3K3075662K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 2026

    Trump's narrative over the past couple of days has gotten more fantastical than ever. He's taken to discussing his level of cognition and his polls - with diametric falsehoods. His break from reality is widening due to age, illness, stress, and desperation. And he's freaked out that time is running out. He cannot say anything truthfully, rarely even speaks informationally, vacillates constantly, goes on late night panic-post benders, and has the attention span of a fruit fly. More elected officials need to start speaking more loudly: Trump is NOT fit to serve and CANNOT continue as president.

    1.2K470382517K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 2026

    The "far right" wants to topple democracy. The β€œfar left” wants to provide free community college. Not really comparable.

    82713310115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 430K followers, an engagement rate of 0.935%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 10.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 101K interactions, about 25x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Duty To Warn πŸ”‰'s engagement rate on X?
Duty To Warn πŸ”‰ (@duty2warn) has an engagement rate of 0.935%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 430,312 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.935%, Duty To Warn πŸ”‰ sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @duty2warn have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @duty2warn post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going