Back to @bumassburner's profile

shhh engagement report

@bumassburner - 557K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.698%
of 557K followers
Per impression
5.57%
70K views on a typical post
Reach
12.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.537%
374 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 557K followers, an engagement rate of 0.698%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 70K times each, and 5.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 7.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bay, #engene, #hashtagging.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #bay, #engene, #hashtagging.

Compared with accounts its own size

shhh's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.698%, shhh sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 23, 20267.9x their median

    #KomeThru https://t.co/ZXD7gJtPGo

    30K71319417307K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20265.4x their median

    https://t.co/jJelmzY5Qs

    20K4661889216K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.0x their median

    #ok https://t.co/F0YuWWRubD

    11K22011310162K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20262.8x their median

    xoxo https://t.co/z7tKqZ7xIV

    11K249752171K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.7x their median

    #hi https://t.co/I8H0pwgGDB

    10K2121085108K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20262.5x their median

    please https://t.co/DzsgBRexHk

    9.6K184446126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.1x their median

    #superpouty https://t.co/fsGl87EkQq

    8.0K15221498K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.9x their median

    #hey #bay https://t.co/iwpYJfGd3n

    7.3K138403111K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20261.8x their median

    just a girl and her #tabis https://t.co/XYiFKiMHqL

    6.9K110264162K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026

    #spamming https://t.co/cvvCbkOlB4

    4.7K8329382K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bay#engene#hashtagging#hey#hi

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 557K followers, an engagement rate of 0.698%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 70K times each, and 5.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 7.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bay, #engene, #hashtagging.

What is shhh's engagement rate on X?
shhh (@bumassburner) has an engagement rate of 0.698%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 556,734 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.698%, shhh sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @bumassburner have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @bumassburner post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going