Back to @anir_diary_'s profile

๐—‹๐—‚๐—‡๐–บ engagement report

@anir_diary_ - 99K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.565%
of 99K followers
Per impression
0.663%
85K views on a typical post
Reach
85.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
562
interactions (median)
Saved
0.133%
112 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 562 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.565%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 3,937 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 85K times each, and 0.663% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 85.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026. Recurring tag: #timelesz_ๆถˆใˆใชใ„่Šฑ็ซ.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐—‹๐—‚๐—‡๐–บ's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,937 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.565%, ๐—‹๐—‚๐—‡๐–บ sits above the 75th percentile of the 38,130 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 38,130 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,028 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%44K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%73K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%91K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%106K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%96K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%70K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%240K
Monday0%305K
Tuesday-3%308K
Wednesday-2%260K
Thursday-1%251K
Friday-3%261K
Saturday+3%235K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 14, 202628x their median

    timelesz่Šๆฑ ้ขจ็ฃจใ€Œใƒ‘ใƒ”ใ‚ณใ€ ๆ–ฐใ‚คใƒกใƒผใ‚ธใ‚ญใƒฃใƒฉใ‚ฏใ‚ฟใƒผๅฐฑไปปโ—๏ธ โ € CMใฏใ‚ชใƒ•ใ‚ฃใ‚นใ€ใ‚ญใƒƒใƒใƒณใ€ใŠ้ขจๅ‘‚ไธŠใŒใ‚Šโ€ฆ ใ•ใพใ–ใพใชโ€ใƒ‘ใƒ”ใ‚ณใ‚ฟใ‚คใƒ โ€ใ‚’ไธ€ไบบ่Šๅฑ…โœจ๏ธ ใ‚ขใƒ‰ใƒชใƒ–ใ‚‚ๆœฌ็ทจใซๆŽก็”จ โ € ๐ŸŽฅใ‚คใƒณใ‚ฟใƒ“ใƒฅใƒผ๏ผ†ๆ’ฎๅฝฑ่ฃ่ฉฑ ใ€Œใ“ใฎๅคใฏๆ—ฅ็„ผใ‘ใ—ใ‚ˆใ†ใ‹ใชใจใ€ https://t.co/dGfUgs6KIs โ € ๅ…จ4ใ‚ฟใ‚คใƒ—ใฎWEB-CM ๆœฌๆ—ฅๅ…ฌ้–‹ https://t.co/wpB39e8tqx

    12K3.2K91782593K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202613x their median

    timelesz่Šๆฑ ้ขจ็ฃจ ใ€Œใƒ‘ใƒ”ใ‚ณใ€ๆ–ฐใ‚คใƒกใƒผใ‚ธใ‚ญใƒฃใƒฉใ‚ฏใ‚ฟใƒผ โœจ๏ธ ๅ…จ4ใ‚ฟใ‚คใƒ—ใฎๆ–ฐCMๅ…ฌ้–‹๐ŸŽฅ ใƒฏใƒณใ‚ซใƒƒใƒˆ้•ทๅ›žใ—ไธญๅฟƒใซใ‚ขใƒ‰ใƒชใƒ–ใ‚‚ๆŽก็”จ https://t.co/FpmxY1A6G5 โ–ซ๏ธใ“ใฎๅคใ€ๆฐ—ๅˆ†ใ‚’ใใ‚Šใ‹ใˆใฆใ‚„ใฃใฆใฟใŸใ„ใ“ใจ ่Šๆฑ ๏ผšๆ—ฅ็„ผใ‘ใ—ใŸใ„ใงใ™ใ€‚ https://t.co/BLGkxOhRPC

    5.5K1.5K23165142K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 202611x their median

    ็พๅ ด่กŒใๆ—ฅใฎๆŒใก็‰ฉ่ผ‰ใ›ใ‚‹ใŸใณๅ…จ้ƒจๅ…ฅใฃใฆใ‚‹ใฎโ‰๏ธใฃใฆ้ฉšใ‹ใ‚Œใ‚‹๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ’˜โญ๏ธ่ท็‰ฉๅคšใ‚ใ‚ชใ‚ฟใ‚ฏใฎๅŽ็ด่ก“ใพใจใ‚๐Ÿ’ผ๐ŸŽ€ๅฟ…่ฆใชใƒขใƒŽ็ง’ใง่ฆ‹ใคใ‹ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใœใฒ๐Ÿ‘Š๐Ÿป๐Ÿ’ฏ https://t.co/aKiuoiJtAB

    6.0K194261789K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20269.5x their median

    2026ๅนดใฎใƒ€ใ‚คใ‚ขใƒณๆดฅ็”ฐใ‚‚็›ธๅค‰ใ‚ใ‚‰ใš็พŽๆ„่ญ˜้ซ˜ใ™ใŽใ‚‹ใ€‚1้€ฑ้–“ใงๆ˜Žใ‚‰ใ‹ใซ่‚Œใฎๅ‡นๅ‡ธ็„กใใชใฃใฆ็ถบ้บ—ใซใชใฃใฆใ‚“ใ ใ‘ใฉโ€ฆใซใ—ใฆใ‚‚ๅŠนๆžœๅ‡บใ‚‹ๆ—ฉใ™ใŽใฆๆ™ฎ้€šใซใƒ“ใƒ“ใ‚‹ใ€‚ https://t.co/BIIh7Q2LKA

    5.0K214776413M viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20265.7x their median

    โฌ…๏ธใฟใŸใ„ใชๆŽจใ—ใจใฎใƒ‘ใƒใƒซใƒ•ใ‚ฉใƒˆ๐Ÿ“ธๆ’ฎใ‚‹ใชใ‚‰(แขแด— ยทฬซ แด—แข)๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป๐Ÿ’•ใœใฃใฃใŸใ„็››ใ‚Œใ‚‹ๅŠ ๅทฅๆ–นๆณ•ใพใจใ‚๐Ÿ“่ƒŒๆ™ฏใผใ‹ใ™ใ ใ‘ใง็”ป่ณช่‰ฏใ็ซ‹ไฝ“็š„ใซ่ฆ‹ใˆใฆโœจ๏พˆ็”ณโœจ https://t.co/wxXew0VNm4

    3.0K18425171K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20265.7x their median

    timeleszใƒป่Šๆฑ ้ขจ็ฃจใŒ ใ€Œใƒ‘ใƒ”ใ‚ณใ€ใ‚คใƒกใƒผใ‚ธใ‚ญใƒฃใƒฉใ‚ฏใ‚ฟใƒผใซโ—๏ธ 4ใ‚ฟใ‚คใƒ—ใฎWEB CMใŒๅ…ฌ้–‹ ๅŽ้ŒฒๅพŒใฎใ‚คใƒณใ‚ฟใƒ“ใƒฅใƒผใ‚‚ๅˆฐ็€๐Ÿ’ญ ่Šๆฑ ใŒใ“ใฎๅคใ‚„ใฃใฆใฟใŸใ„ใ“ใจใฏโ€ฆ ใ€Œใ‚ฌใƒณใ‚ฌใƒณๅคช้™ฝใ‚’ๆตดใณใŸใ„ใ€ https://t.co/a6LsWaRTyY #่Šๆฑ ้ขจ็ฃจ https://t.co/GBnJYcEGMw

    2.5K65523853K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20265.2x their median

    ไปŠๅนดใฎๅคใ‚‚๏ฝถ๏พœ๏ฝฒ๏ฝฒๆ€ใ„ๅ‡บ้‡็”ฃ่จˆ็”ปโžฐีžโธโธ> เผฅ <โธโธีž๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ€โ—โœฉ https://t.co/vuTAprBbWh

    2.9K39110135K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20264.8x their median

    ๆŽจใ—ใฎใŸใ‚ใซ้•ท่ท้›ข็งปๅ‹•ใ™ใ‚‹ๆ—ฅใฎ๐Ÿš…๐Ÿ’˜๐Ÿ’ซโญ๏ธŽ่ฒทใฃใฆใ‚ˆใ‹ใฃใŸใƒขใƒŽใพใจใ‚แฐโœ๐Ÿป้ ๅพ็€ใ‹ใ‚‰ๅฐ็‰ฉใพใงใƒกใƒณใ‚ซใƒฉใ‚ใ‚ใ›ใ—ใŸใ‚‰ๅ€ใ‹ใ‚ใ„ใ™ใŽใฆ๐Ÿ˜ป๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ’ฎ๐Ÿ’• https://t.co/K9VSsV3h90

    2.6K6219215K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20264.6x their median

    ใคใ‘ใ‚‹ใ ใ‘ใงใœใฃใฃใŸใ„็››ใ‚Œใ‚‹๏ผžแต•๏ผœ๐ŸŽต๐Ÿ’•ใƒ›ใƒ“็ณป็ตฑใฎApple Watchใ‚ซใ‚นใ‚ฟใƒ โŒš๏ธใพใจใ‚แฐโœ๐Ÿปโœฉ๊™ณๅ†™็œŸใงใ‚‚ใ‚ญใƒฉใƒƒใ‚ญใƒฉๅญ˜ๅœจๆ„ŸใงใฆใŠๆฐ—ใซๅ…ฅใ‚Š๐ŸŽ€ ๊’ท๊’ฆโ™ก https://t.co/0zhf9yokGw

    2.5K84112243K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20264.4x their median

    \\็™บๅฃฒๅ‰ใ‹ใ‚‰ใŠๅ•ใ„ๅˆใ‚ใ›ๅคšๆ•ฐ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ’˜โญ๏ธ // LUMIGNONๅˆใฎ"ใƒˆใƒผใƒˆใƒใƒƒใ‚ฐ"ใŒ ใคใ„ใซ็™ปๅ ด๐Ÿ’ผ๐ŸŽ€โŒ’โ™ก๏ฝก๏ผŽ ๏ฝท๏พ—๏ฝท๏พ—ใƒ“ใ‚ธใƒฅใƒผร—ใทใฃใใ‚Šใ‚ญใƒซใƒ†ใ‚ฃใƒณใ‚ฐใซ ใ†ใกใ‚ใŒๅ…ฅใ‚‹ใƒใ‚ฑใƒƒใƒˆไป˜ใใง ็พๅ ดใƒป้€šๅญฆใƒปๆ—…่กŒใซใดใฃใŸใ‚Š๐ŸŽค๐Ÿ’• ๐Ÿ“ข7/9 21:00- ็™บๅฃฒ้–‹ๅง‹๐Ÿ’˜ ใŠ่ฆ‹้€ƒใ—ใชใแข T๊’ณโ€‹T แขโ˜๐Ÿป๐ŸŒŸ https://t.co/hrgl1mlrN1

    2.1K1443247793K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#timelesz_ๆถˆใˆใชใ„่Šฑ็ซ

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 562 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.565%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 3,937 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 85K times each, and 0.663% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 85.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

What is ๐—‹๐—‚๐—‡๐–บ's engagement rate on X?
๐—‹๐—‚๐—‡๐–บ (@anir_diary_) has an engagement rate of 0.565%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 99,438 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.565%, ๐—‹๐—‚๐—‡๐–บ sits above the 75th percentile of the 38,130 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @anir_diary_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,937 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @anir_diary_ post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going