Back to @Wascapp's profile

Wascapp engagement report

@Wascapp - 90K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
10.2%
of 90K followers
Per impression
8.67%
107K views on a typical post
Reach
118.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
9.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.099%
106 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.17/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 9.2K interactions against 90K followers, an engagement rate of 10.2%. Posts are seen about 107K times each, and 8.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 118.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 82K interactions, about 8.9x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 10.2%, Wascapp sits above the 90th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.10% to 156.3%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 16, 20268.9x their median

    El Cuti Romero puede gritarle un gol en la cara al arquero, festejarle en la cara a Bellingham y NO SE ATREVEN NI A MIRARLO. El Colo Barco se comió un saque en la nuca y ni jugó https://t.co/a8iTtGetKH

    77K4.4K161105944K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20266.2x their median

    El profesionalismo de Mariano Closs y quizás el mejor gol de este Mundial. https://t.co/UUWadFKyq7

    54K2.8K2993201.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20265.9x their median

    Al verdadero futbolero nunca se le ocurriría salir a la calle a festejar un pase a cuartos de final

    47K6.8K5295921.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20265.7x their median

    "La noche anterior al partido, no dijo ni una palabra, ni una, esa noche no escucho música, tampoco hizo chistes, no hizo nada, pensamos que se sentía mal, salió al balcón mirando a la nada, estaba pensativo" Tata Brown sobre Diego el día anterior al partido con Inglaterra. https://t.co/kXDmLWiKyX

    49K3.2K2053583.5M viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 20264.1x their median

    El Indio Solari predicaba que "el lujo es vulgaridad", pero murió en una lujosa mansión de Parque Leloir. Vivió y murió como un hipócrita. https://t.co/Z544smmqVu

    28K3.4K5.3K1.1K3.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20263.7x their median

    Por favor esta secuencia. https://t.co/iHjDYuSA2f

    31K2.6K1552361.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20263.7x their median

    🇨🇲🪄 Who remembers when Vincent Aboubakar did this at the 2022 World Cup for Cameroon? 🥶 https://t.co/enwkhjYnJE

    31K2.2K2601274.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20263.6x their median

    El país hasta el minuto 78 era un velorio y ahora estamos todos así: https://t.co/muwUvMvG6e

    28K5.5K635222K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20263.5x their median

    Saben quien no hubiese perdido la marca de Ferran Torres cuando le queda el rebote? Duele https://t.co/wC1NZ0W0Li

    32K680112292.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.9x their median

    Encima hoy es el día del amigo la concha de su madre. No quiero ver a ninguno de los pelotudos de mis amigos.

    25K2.5K26109410K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 9.2K interactions against 90K followers, an engagement rate of 10.2%. Posts are seen about 107K times each, and 8.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 118.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 82K interactions, about 8.9x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Wascapp's engagement rate on X?
Wascapp (@Wascapp) has an engagement rate of 10.2%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 90,443 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 10.2%, Wascapp sits above the 90th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Wascapp have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Wascapp post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going