Back to @Simi_Garewal's profile

Simi_Garewal engagement report

@Simi_Garewal - 95K followers on X

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.24%
of 95K followers
Per impression
7.43%
3.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.23%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
229
interactions (median)
Saved
0.357%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 229 interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 0.24%. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 7.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 201x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #osho.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.24%, Simi_Garewal sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 19, 2026201x their median

    A Japanese immunologist spent 20 years proving that the chemicals trees release into the air walk into your bloodstream, hunt down your stress hormones, and arm your immune system in ways no therapist or pharmaceutical has ever matched, and most of the data has been sitting in Japanese medical journals for two decades waiting to be translated. His name is Qing Li. He is a clinical professor at Nippon Medical School in Tokyo and the president of the Japanese Society of Forest Medicine. The Japanese government has been funding his research since 2004, and the body of work he has produced is the reason forest bathing is now an officially prescribed clinical therapy in Japan and Korea. The story actually starts in 1982, when the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries coined the term shinrin-yoku to describe the practice of slow, mindful walking in a forest. They did it for a practical reason. Japan was urbanizing fast, stress-related illness was climbing, and the country had thousands of square kilometers of forest sitting unused. The idea was to give people a reason to walk into the trees... They had no idea what was actually happening to the human body during those walks until Qing Li ran the first proper experiment in 2005. He took twelve healthy adult men on a three-day, two-night trip to a forest park. They walked for a few hours each day. Nothing strenuous. No prescribed routes or breathing exercises. They simply walked slowly through the trees, breathing the air, looking at the forest. Li drew blood and urine samples before the trip, on the second day, on the third day, on day seven after returning home, and again on day thirty. The numbers that came back from the lab were not what anyone expected. The activity of a specific type of immune cell called the natural killer cell, which is the cell your body uses to hunt down cancer cells and virus-infected cells before they can spread, had jumped by roughly 50 percent during the forest trip. The actual number of natural killer cells circulating in the bloodstream had increased significantly. Three different anti-cancer proteins that those cells produce, called perforin, granzymes, and granulysin, had all risen sharply. And the effect did not disappear when the men went home. The immune boost was still measurable on day seven and was still partially present on day thirty. Two hours a day in a forest had upgraded the immune system for a full month. Li ran the same experiment with women a year later and found nearly identical results. Then he ran it with a control group who took a three-day trip through an urban area with the same amount of walking, the same hotel quality, and the same diet. The urban group showed no measurable change in natural killer cell activity at all. The forest was doing the work, not the vacation. The mechanism turned out to be a class of airborne molecules called phytoncides. Trees produce these compounds to defend themselves against insects, bacteria, and fungi. Pine, cedar, oak, and cypress trees release them in particularly large amounts, especially in warmer weather and after rainfall. When you walk through a forest, you are inhaling those molecules into your lungs and absorbing them through your skin, and once inside your body they appear to directly stimulate the production and activity of the very immune cells Li was measuring in his lab. Roughly 50 percent of the health benefit of a forest walk, according to Li's data, comes from the chemistry of the air itself. The other half comes from what the forest is doing to your nervous system. This is where it stops being only about the immune system and starts being about stress. A separate Japanese research team measured cortisol, the body's main stress hormone, in 84 participants across 35 different forest sites. They drew samples before and after a 30-minute walk in each forest and compared them to control walks in matched urban environments. The cortisol levels of the people who walked in the forest were lower than the cortisol levels of the people who walked in the city by a significant margin. Their heart rates were lower. Their blood pressure was lower. The activity of their parasympathetic nervous system, which is the part responsible for rest and recovery, had gone up. The activity of their sympathetic nervous system, which is the part that drives fight or flight, had gone down. Then a researcher at the University of Michigan named MaryCarol Hunter ran the cleanest version of this experiment ever done. She recruited participants from a city and told them to take a nature pill three times a week for eight weeks. They were free to choose the time, the place, and the duration of the nature experience, as long as it was outside, in daylight, and free of phones, conversations, and aerobic exercise. They sent her saliva samples before and after each session so she could measure cortisol changes accurately and rule out the normal daily drop in stress hormones that happens to everyone. The result was that participants experienced a 21.3 percent drop in cortisol per hour spent in nature, with the biggest payoff happening between minutes 20 and 30 of the walk. After that, the cortisol kept dropping, but more slowly. The threshold dose for measurable stress relief was just 20 minutes outside in something that looked and felt like nature. What none of this means is that nature is a substitute for therapy or for medication when someone genuinely needs them. Therapy treats different things than a walk does, and Li himself has been careful in interviews to call forest bathing a complementary intervention rather than a replacement for clinical care. But what the research has settled is that the human body has a physiological response to being among trees that operates on the same biological systems modern medicine is trying to reach with drugs and clinical protocols, and that response is fast, measurable, and free. The strangest part of Li's work is the implication he keeps repeating in interviews. The average person now spends more than 90 percent of their life indoors. Their cortisol stays elevated. Their natural killer cells stay sluggish. Their parasympathetic nervous system rarely gets a chance to take over. The system that was tuned by millions of years of life under a canopy of trees is being asked to run permanently inside a box made of drywall and screens. Your body has not forgotten what it is supposed to do in a forest. It is waiting for you to walk into one.

    34K10K5198791.5M viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 202648x their median

    🚨🚨 Robert Kennedy Jr. acaba de revelar que la radiación Wi-Fi causa cáncer... Lo dijo en el programa de Joe Rogan y representa a cientos de pacientes que tienen tumores cerebrales causados ​​por ello... Los tumores son glioblastomas, una de las formas más letales de cáncer cerebral... Kennedy afirma que siempre aparecen en el mismo lado de la cabeza, donde el paciente sostenía el teléfono... Pero el cáncer ni siquiera es el peor efecto... Kennedy afirma que la radiación Wi-Fi abre la barrera hematoencefálica, permitiendo que todas las toxinas presentes en el cuerpo pasen al tejido cerebral: • Glifosato procedente de los alimentos • Microplásticos procedentes del agua • Retardantes de llama en los muebles Los investigadores que publicaron estos hallazgos lo denominaron "cerebro permeable". El gobierno estadounidense respondió suprimiendo la investigación y suspendiendo la financiación. Kennedy afirma que decenas de miles de estudios documentan el peligro. Rusia desarrolló la radiación Wi-Fi como arma. Las escuelas rusas prohíben los teléfonos móviles. Los niveles de radiación permitidos son una ínfima parte de los que permite Estados Unidos. Kennedy demandó a la FCC por este motivo. El tribunal falló a su favor. Sus recomendaciones: • Nunca duermas con el teléfono cerca • Nunca sostengas tu teléfono contra tu cabeza • Nunca lleves el teléfono en el bolsillo del pecho. La ciencia existe. El gobierno optó por ocultarla...

    7.3K3.5K145134618K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202634x their median

    #Venezuela: Los peluditos! "Si hay una persona con vida que hable, que emita algun sonido"...y el peludito del primer video ladro como.diciendo "estoy aqui" 🙂 Al cachorrito del 2do video los bomberos le dieron respiracion asistida y respondio! ☺️ El del 3er. Video salio feliz moviendo la cola! 🥲 El 4to video con varias mascotas rescatadas! Gracias por no dejarlos atras! Ellos son parte de la vida de gente que los quiere o que los quizo como parte de su familia..

    5.8K1.8K525392K viewsView on X
  • May 31, 202623x their median

    In a Telangana town, a bull comes to a dosa stall each morning for a snack. The stall owner, the bull's friend, makes him two dosas with no-spice potato masala. The bull waits patiently until they are done. After he fan cools the dosas he feeds them to his friend. This routine has been on for years.

    4.4K75916252213K viewsView on X
  • Apr 6, 20267.5x their median

    I have deleted my post, but not my opinion. I believed X was a place for a civilized discourse. But I can see there is no freedom of speech here and no civility.

    1.5K1681572165K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.7x their median

    Now tell me.. isn't this talent just WOW?! (Via Insta) https://t.co/fUeTkvey9P

    1.1K176371360K viewsView on X
  • Jun 21, 20261.9x their median

    Your Lordships..please note 🙏 https://t.co/sVEkiokQrJ

    3199323813K viewsView on X
  • Mar 19, 20261.7x their median

    I've just unsubscribed & unfollowed @PiersUncensored & all his sites, IDs & handles. He is the most biased (so called) journalist who only promotes his own agenda; it's clear for all to discern. He's not worth wasting a second of my time.

    3193144328K viewsView on X
  • Mar 13, 2026

    Trump has made statements. Iran too, multiple statements. Why no statement from Netanyahu?? 🤐

    2473554723K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 2026

    They save the lives of all dogs, pets & strays from the rubble of the earthquake in Venezuela. All lives are precious. This is humanity. Are you watching Your Lordships..? https://t.co/cW9udMsPRW

    18351614.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#osho

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 229 interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 0.24%. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 7.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 201x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Simi_Garewal's engagement rate on X?
Simi_Garewal (@Simi_Garewal) has an engagement rate of 0.24%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 95,432 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.24%, Simi_Garewal sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Simi_Garewal have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Simi_Garewal post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going