Rep. Anna Paulina Luna engagement report
@RepLuna - 621K followers on X
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 5.9K interactions against 621K followers, an engagement rate of 0.945%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 53K times each, and 11.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #backgroundchecksnow.
Compared with accounts its own size
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.945%, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.437% to 2.10%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.437% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 159.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 80K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 88K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 97K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 100K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 103K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 93K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 87K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 82K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 76K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 67K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 235K |
| Monday | 0% | 296K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 292K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 254K |
| Thursday | -2% | 248K |
| Friday | -3% | 256K |
| Saturday | +3% | 230K |
Best tweets
- Aug 13, 20264.5x their median
Newly declassified documents about “Operation Round River” show how FBI Director Wray covered up the Biden family ties to Ukraine and labeled it as “Russian disinformation”. According to the new documents, Wray had multiple confidential sources about the Biden’s, Burisma and Ukraine but instead of investigating them, he ran damage control to neutralize the story and cover it all up during the 2020 election.
- Aug 18, 20263.3x their median
Thankfully we forced Eric Swalwell to RESIGN! Turns out he’s not just a CREEP facing sexual misconduct allegations, he was sleeping with a Chinese spy who helped place interns in his congressional office while soliciting illegal foreign campaign donations. 🤯 And this is the guy who spent years accusing President Trump of “collusion.”
- Aug 20, 20262.5x their median
I came to Congress to deliver wins for the American people and expose corruption within our government. I didn’t come here to make friends with the swamp, I came to drain it.
- Aug 24, 20262.4x their median
Foreign governments should NOT be able to secretly bankroll influencers to push propaganda on Americans. Today, I introduced the bipartisan Foreign Propaganda Disclosure Act to bring social media influencers under FARA and expose who is paying them. Americans deserve to know who’s behind the message.
- Aug 20, 20262.2x their median
Democrats are more upset about Natalie Harp’s clearance than they are about Eric Swallwell placing Chinese spies as interns in congressional offices, and a chinese spy interacting CLOSELY with MULTIPLE Democrat members of Congress.
- Aug 18, 20261.7x their median
If there was ever a perfect example of why Congress needs background checks for members AND staffers look no further than Eric Swalwell and “Fang Fang”. You CANNOT serve in Congress and be a dual citizen or have allegiance to any country other than the United States. That’s just common sense.
- Aug 14, 2026
https://t.co/0IsFcsLz8G
- Aug 20, 2026
NEVER FORGET: Republicans delivered NO TAX ON TIPS and NO TAX ON OVERTIME for millions of hardworking Americans. Haters can hate, but I’m focused on winning. 🇺🇸
- Aug 24, 2026
There is a big difference between having an organic opinion and secretly acting on behalf of foreign interests to push propaganda to Americans. Foreign adversaries have been actively using disinformation and psychological operations to divide America, erode our national security, and undermine U.S. foreign policy. Americans deserve to know when the voices shaping what they see online are working on behalf of foreign interests.
- Aug 19, 2026
DSA activists love to blame white people for their problems. If you’re doing that, you’re not just ignorant you’re racist. And yes, despite what DSA says, as a half-white half-Hispanic woman I can assure you, being anti-white is racist. https://t.co/wV34y9YI53
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 5.9K interactions against 621K followers, an engagement rate of 0.945%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 53K times each, and 11.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.
- What is Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's engagement rate on X?
- Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (@RepLuna) has an engagement rate of 0.945%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 620,625 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.945%, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RepLuna have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RepLuna post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.