RAFI engagement report
@Rafi_CryptoX - 399K followers on X
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 399K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.235% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122 interactions, about 4.1x its own typical post.
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
RAFI's engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 13% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.007%, RAFI sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 155.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 238K |
| Monday | 0% | 302K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 302K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 257K |
| Thursday | -2% | 250K |
| Friday | -3% | 259K |
| Saturday | +3% | 233K |
Best tweets
- Aug 16, 20264.1x their median
📈 Reddit joining the S&P 500 is bigger than an “index prestige” headline. The mechanical flow matters: index trackers may need to absorb a large block of $RDDT shares around inclusion. But the more important question is strategic. Reddit has evolved from a chaotic user-generated forum into a public company large and profitable enough for a benchmark index, while AI is simultaneously changing how people discover information online. My read: the next phase for $RDDT is not about index demand. It is whether community-generated knowledge, direct traffic and data licensing can become a durable moat while search referrals become less predictable. That makes Reddit an interesting test of whether human conversation itself can remain valuable infrastructure in an AI-first internet. Disclaimer: Market commentary only. Not financial advice. Verify primary-source updates before making investment decisions. $RDDT @Reddit #Reddit #SP500 #AI
- Aug 15, 20263.3x their median
📑 Bitcoin treasury companies are back under index scrutiny, but the headline needs precision. MSCI has opened an August consultation on a broader “non-operating company” screen. The proposal is not limited to digital-asset treasury firms. Under the simulated application reported for May data, Strategy, Metaplanet and Yellow Cake would be deletion candidates from the MSCI ACWI IMI framework. Nothing has been decided. MSCI is seeking feedback through September 30, expects consultation results by mid-October, and any adopted methodology change would be tied to a later index review process. This is primarily an equity-market-structure issue, not a change to Bitcoin itself. Index eligibility can influence passive ownership, liquidity and a company’s cost of capital even when its BTC holdings do not change. That creates a separate risk layer for treasury-company shareholders. The useful distinction: consultation ≠ deletion, and simulated index impact ≠ executed market flow. Disclaimer: Informational market-structure commentary only. The MSCI proposal is under consultation and may change or not be adopted. Not investment advice. $BTC $MSTR @MSCI_Inc #Bitcoin #MSTR #MSCI #CryptoEquities
- Aug 14, 20263.0x their median
Good Morning Web3 A major U.S. climate case now has a date: October 5, 2026. ⚖️🌎 The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County. The core issue is not whether climate change exists. It is jurisdiction and legal authority: can state and local governments pursue damages against fossil-fuel companies under state law for climate-related harms, or are those claims displaced by federal law? TIME notes that the ruling could affect roughly two dozen other climate-accountability cases brought by states, counties and cities. That makes this more than one local lawsuit. A decision could influence where climate-liability cases are heard, what legal theories remain available, and how future costs are allocated between governments, companies and taxpayers. The legal architecture around climate risk is becoming a financial variable of its own. Disclaimer: News and legal commentary only. Not legal advice. The case is pending and no outcome is implied. #SCOTUS #ClimateLaw #EnergyPolicy #ClimateRisk
- Aug 14, 20262.9x their median
Good Night Guys.. See you all Tomorrow 🌍 Stablecoins are increasingly about geopolitical settlement, not only dollar-denominated crypto liquidity. PSB Bank’s CEO says the rouble-backed A7A5 stablecoin has generated nearly $140B in turnover since its February 2025 launch. He also said the broader A7 settlement platform has about 15,000 regular customers and processes up to 2,000 payments per day. But the compliance context is inseparable from the volume data. The U.S., EU and UK have sanctioned several entities they say are behind the Kyrgyzstan-based stablecoin. That combination is the real story: settlement utility and sanctions exposure can grow at the same time. Turnover is not market capitalization, and high transaction volume does not by itself prove broad, compliant adoption. A7A5 is better studied as a case of how stablecoin rails intersect with geopolitics, correspondent banking and enforcement than as an investment narrative. Disclaimer: Informational and compliance-focused commentary only. Not an endorsement, solicitation or investment recommendation. $A7A5 #Stablecoins #A7A5 #CryptoPolicy #CrossBorderPayments
- Aug 13, 20262.5x their median
Good morning X family 💳 Canada’s payments infrastructure is getting a major ownership reset. RBC and BMO have agreed to sell their jointly owned payments company Moneris to Francisco Partners for approximately C$2 billion in cash. Each bank is set to receive a 50% share of the consideration. More importantly, both banks are keeping long-term commercial ties through exclusive referral agreements with Moneris. So this is not a clean separation. It is a change in ownership while preserving distribution relationships. 🏦🤝 Moneris says it has nearly 2,000 employees in Canada, while Finextra reports that the company handles roughly one-third of Canadian business transactions. The transaction also reflects a broader payments trend: banks can own valuable merchant-acquiring infrastructure for decades, then decide that a specialist technology investor is better positioned to fund the next stage of product and platform development. Francisco Partners brings a payments portfolio that has included companies such as Verifone, NMI and Paymetric. Former Global Payments CEO Jeff Sloan is expected to become Moneris chairman. The deal remains subject to regulatory approvals and is expected to close by the end of the first quarter of RBC and BMO’s fiscal 2027. Disclaimer: Informational M&A and payments commentary only. Not investment advice. $RY $BMO @RBC @BMO @Moneris @Finextra #Payments #FinTech #Moneris #MergersAndAcquisitions #Canada
- Aug 14, 20262.3x their median
July 2026 was not just “a hot month.” It set a new U.S. record. 🌡📈 NOAA reports that the contiguous United States averaged 76.9°F in July, 3.3°F above the 20th-century average. That made it the warmest July and the warmest month in the 132-year national record, edging past the previous peaks from July 1936 and July 2012. The overnight data may be even more important. Average minimum temperatures reached 64.2°F, 3.7°F above normal and the highest monthly average low in the record. Why does that matter? Hot nights reduce the body’s ability to recover from daytime heat and can increase pressure on energy systems, public health and infrastructure. Climate risk increasingly looks less like one dramatic event and more like multiple systems being stressed at the same time. Disclaimer: Informational climate commentary based on published NOAA data. @TIME @NOAA #Climate #ExtremeHeat #ClimateData #Infrastructure
- Aug 17, 20262.1x their median
🧠 Bitcoin security is becoming an AI-access problem. More than three dozen bitcoin and crypto organizations, in an effort organized by the Bitcoin Policy Institute, are asking frontier AI labs to create trusted access pathways for qualified open-source security defenders. The request goes beyond “give developers better chatbots.” It includes earlier access to capable models, compute resources, secure environments for private-code testing and direct security channels with AI labs. The concern is asymmetric capability. If attackers can run powerful local or unrestricted models while maintainers of critical open-source infrastructure are blocked by safety filters or excluded from trusted-partner programs, defensive research can fall behind. For Bitcoin, this is a far more concrete AI story than another “AI + crypto” narrative. The question is whether maintainers can use frontier models to audit code, reproduce exploits and harden infrastructure before vulnerabilities scale. Disclaimer: Technology and security commentary only. Not financial or investment advice. $BTC @bitcoinpolicy #Bitcoin #Cybersecurity #AI #OpenSource
- Aug 17, 20262.1x their median
🧭 THREAT-ACTOR NAMES ARE BECOMING CYBERSECURITY INFRASTRUCTURE Google Threat Intelligence has unified its threat-actor naming system around memorable two-word cryptonyms. The second word communicates a category such as attribution or activity type: CASTLE for China-linked groups, ION for Iran, NEPTUNE for North Korea, RELIC for Russia and COMET for cybercriminal clusters. TechCrunch reports Google now tracks more than 5,000 activity clusters. The real value is operational clarity. Consistent naming helps defenders connect historical behavior, aliases and incident-response context without treating attribution as perfect or permanent. Disclaimer: Defensive threat-intelligence commentary only. Attribution can change as new evidence emerges. $GOOGL @GoogleCloudSec @TechCrunch #ThreatIntelligence #Cybersecurity #GoogleCloud
- Aug 12, 20261.9x their median
Good Morning Web3 📊 ETHEREUM ACTIVITY SPIKED WHILE TRADING VOLUME COOLED Data reviewed by CryIP showed Ethereum active addresses jumping from 377,381 on August 8 to 932,847 on August 9, a 147% one-day increase. But the surrounding data tells a more complicated story. Over the same weekly snapshot, Ethereum DEX volume was down 44.7% and perpetual volume was down 52.4%, even as TVL and market capitalization moved higher. That divergence is the useful signal. More active addresses do not automatically equal more economic demand. A one-day surge can reflect campaigns, contract interactions, bots, wallet behavior or genuine user growth. For $ETH analysis, address counts become more meaningful when paired with volume, fees, TVL and stablecoin settlement. ⚠️ Data snapshot only. Not financial or investment advice. #Ethereum #ETH #OnChain #DeFi #CryptoData
- Aug 13, 20261.7x their median
🍎 One of the architects of Apple’s digital-wallet strategy is preparing to leave. Jennifer Bailey, Apple’s long-time head of Pay and Wallet services, is set to depart in October after 23 years at the company. Her tenure covers a major transformation in how the iPhone participates in commerce. Bailey led Apple Pay from its 2014 launch and also oversaw the growth of Apple Wallet, Apple Card, fraud prevention, partner operations, gift cards, and trust and safety responsibilities connected to services. The strategic story is bigger than payments. 📱💳 Apple Wallet has gradually moved from storing payment credentials toward replacing pieces of the physical wallet itself, including tickets, keys, identity-related credentials and other digital passes. That makes succession important. The next leader will inherit a product area sitting at the intersection of financial institutions, card networks, regulators, merchants, identity, privacy and device-level security. Apple’s challenge now is to keep expanding wallet utility without weakening the trust model that made users comfortable putting increasingly sensitive credentials on a phone. Disclaimer: Informational technology and payments commentary only. Not investment advice. $AAPL @Apple @Finextra #ApplePay #AppleWallet #Payments #FinTech #DigitalIdentity
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 399K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.235% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122 interactions, about 4.1x its own typical post.
- What is RAFI's engagement rate on X?
- RAFI (@Rafi_CryptoX) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 399,492 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.007%, RAFI sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Rafi_CryptoX have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Rafi_CryptoX post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.