Back to @OliveiraRafa's profile

Rafael Oliveira engagement report

@OliveiraRafa - 401K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 401K followers
Per impression
1.13%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.41%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
155
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 155 interactions against 401K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56K interactions, about 360x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rafael Oliveira's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, Rafael Oliveira sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,996 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,714 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 10, 2026360x their median

    Começa hoje um novo caminho. Bem-vindo à Seleção Nacional, Mister Jorge Jesus. 🇵🇹 #ViemosParaVencer https://t.co/B9Re2bCuAa

    48K5.5K1.3K8331.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202673x their median

    Foi, sem dúvidas, o melhor jogo da Bélgica na Copa. E a vergonhosa decisão da subserviente Fifa faz com que a imagem final dos EUA não seja o reconhecimento pelo bom futebol apresentado no torneio, mas sim a antipatia geral por um presidente que usou sua influência política para rasgar o regulamento. O resultado vira um alívio para o esporte, mas o estrago está feito.

    11K6225613139K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 202657x their median

    No 2º tempo, nem a Noruega parecia querer ter a bola por tanto tempo. Por vezes, implorava pro Brasil subir a pressão, mas isso não aconteceu. Virou uma lenta troca de passes mais como proteção do que ameaça. Evitava correr riscos para não ceder contra-ataques. Um bom exemplo foi a chance de Endrick. Nasceu do raro momento em que Odegaard arriscou um passe vertical. No fim, Haaland fez a diferença. Impressionou a falta de agressividade do Brasil para incomodar a posse adversária, mesmo que a estratégia fosse esperar para contra-atacar. Dentro da proposta, até criou para ter placar melhor, mas parou em Nyland. O frustrante para o Brasil é a sensação de que nem "correu o risco" de tentar dorminar o jogo no campo de ataque.

    8.2K51615035209K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202657x their median

    Um memorável sufoco de Cabo Verde pra cima da Argentina num mata-mata de Copa do Mundo. Chega ao fim um espetáculo de participação. Que competitividade. Quanto mérito em fazer o que fez diante de campeãs do mundo como Espanha, Uruguai e Argentina.

    8.2K527611578K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202648x their median

    Agora já começa a sensação de que está acabando. A partir de amanhã, dois jogos por dia. Agenda das oitavas: Sábado, 14h - Canadá x Marrocos Sábado, 18h - Paraguai x França Domingo, 17h - Brasil x Noruega Domingo, 21h - México x Inglaterra Segunda, 16h - Portugal x Espanha Segunda, 21h - EUA x Bélgica Terça, 13h - Argentina x Egito Terça, 17h - Suíça x Colômbia

    6.9K3236967178K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202643x their median

    Lionel Messi. Que privilégio é acompanhar cada página da história sendo escrita.

    6.0K622451881K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202639x their median

    Que loucura de jogo e de virada da Argentina. Egito fez um partidaço (tantas coisas para elogiar e reconhecer), mas a reação conduzida por Messi é um daqueles capítulos incríveis que vão diretamente para a história das Copas. 15 minutos fantásticos que transformaram o 0x2 em 3x2.

    5.5K28320513201K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202633x their median

    Que virada da Argentina. Mais uma partidaça de Lionel Messi - e certamente a melhor da seleção na Copa até aqui (já era a melhor mesmo enquanto perdia). Enfim veio a imposição técnica que não sustentou atuações contra Cabo Verde, Egito e Suíça. E o roteiro da Inglaterra não foi tão diferente de jogos anteriores. Passou por México e Noruega sendo inferior em consideráveis períodos dos jogos e terminando com a mesma ideia da linha de 5 de hoje. A diferença é que hoje não segurou até o fim. Aliás, hoje já não era melhor mesmo quando abre o placar. Tem sido uma Copa de roteiros épicos para a Argentina, mas hoje, além de uma vitória gigante num duelo de muita rivalidade, foi a atuação coletiva mais marcante do time na edição.

    4.9K17453774K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202628x their median

    Agenda das quartas: Quinta, 17h - França x Marrocos Sexta, 16h - Espanha x Bélgica Sábado, 18h - Noruega x Inglaterra Sábado, 22h - Argentina x Suíça

    4.0K2176284133K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202627x their median

    Golaço absurdo do Sidny Cabral é um daqueles que, se a zebra se confirmar, você conta por gerações. Tipo o do Hagi contra a Argentina em 1994.

    4.0K10225354K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 155 interactions against 401K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56K interactions, about 360x its own typical post.

What is Rafael Oliveira's engagement rate on X?
Rafael Oliveira (@OliveiraRafa) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 401,015 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, Rafael Oliveira sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OliveiraRafa have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @OliveiraRafa post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going