Back to @OfficialLoganK's profile

Logan Kilpatrick engagement report

@OfficialLoganK - 363K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.617%
of 363K followers
Per impression
1.24%
181K views on a typical post
Reach
49.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.086%
156 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 363K followers, an engagement rate of 0.617%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 4,366 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 181K times each, and 1.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 49.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Logan Kilpatrick's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,366 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.617%, Logan Kilpatrick sits above the 75th percentile of the 42,087 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.449% to 2.07%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.084%
p750.449%
p902.07%
p99143.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 42,087 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 84,187 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.084%
75th percentile0.449%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile143.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%59K
01:00 UTC-2%60K
02:00 UTC-4%59K
03:00 UTC-4%62K
04:00 UTC-6%50K
05:00 UTC-5%49K
06:00 UTC-5%57K
07:00 UTC-5%61K
08:00 UTC-4%71K
09:00 UTC-4%82K
10:00 UTC-3%84K
11:00 UTC-3%92K
12:00 UTC-2%101K
13:00 UTC-2%110K
14:00 UTC-3%113K
15:00 UTC-1%117K
16:00 UTC-3%114K
17:00 UTC-3%106K
18:00 UTC-2%99K
19:00 UTC-2%94K
20:00 UTC-1%87K
21:00 UTC-1%78K
22:00 UTC-2%67K
23:00 UTC-1%60K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%258K
Monday+1%330K
Tuesday-2%357K
Wednesday-4%326K
Thursday-3%275K
Friday-3%277K
Saturday+3%251K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 20264.0x their median

    Say hello to Gemini 3.6 Flash, designed to be higher intelligence, more token efficient, and with a new lower price, based directly on developer feedback! 3.6 Flash continues our progress towards models that are deeply usable in real world scenarios! https://t.co/U2PwriHMX5

    7.4K4856672511.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.7x their median

    if your opponent is busy making a mistake, don’t interrupt them

    5.1K140609139749K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20262.5x their median

    it’s surprising to me how many people seem to not understand that great models are built with super high quality curated data finding novel ways to create / get this data is a huge edge

    4.8K21238996712K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20262.2x their median

    I remain steadfast bullish on Gemini :)

    4.1K11763793668K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20262.0x their median

    don’t forget to overthink the best case scenario too : )

    4.0K27321341243K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.0x their median

    Gemini 3.7 is our fastest growing model launch to date, amazing to see the reception!!!

    4.0K9235729321K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20261.9x their median

    Today we are rolling out pretty URL’s for deployed apps in @GoogleAIStudio, each app can get a “https://t.co/FvJdcNxK0w”, for free! Free apps, free deploys, and now free pretty URLs! https://t.co/qkxnOyfiTr

    3.7K29322992449K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20261.8x their median

    Automating AI research is going to look a lot more like data cleaning than it is going to look like inventing the transformer

    3.7K16620943295K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.6x their median

    Introducing Gemini 3.5 Transcribe, our new speech to text model with smart transcription, function calling, more precise transcription (lower WER), custom vocabulary support, multi-speaker identification, and support for over 85 languages! Also with realtime streaming support! https://t.co/5xUmKmc4OY

    3.2K16722654312K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20261.6x their median

    we have now entered the super app era

    3.1K10329238338K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 363K followers, an engagement rate of 0.617%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 4,366 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 181K times each, and 1.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 49.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.

What is Logan Kilpatrick's engagement rate on X?
Logan Kilpatrick (@OfficialLoganK) has an engagement rate of 0.617%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 363,467 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.617%, Logan Kilpatrick sits above the 75th percentile of the 42,087 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OfficialLoganK have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,366 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @OfficialLoganK post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Logan Kilpatrick (@OfficialLoganK) Engagement Rate - 0.617% | PlayerSells