Back to @KyleBrandt's profile

Kyle Brandt engagement report

@KyleBrandt - 500K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.188%
of 500K followers
Per impression
0.598%
157K views on a typical post
Reach
31.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
940
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
34 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.4/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 940 interactions against 500K followers, an engagement rate of 0.188%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 4,273 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 157K times each, and 0.598% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #bills.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kyle Brandt's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,273 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.188%, Kyle Brandt sits above the 50th percentile of the 41,299 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.083% to 0.445%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.083%
p750.445%
p902.07%
p99144.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 41,299 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 90,063 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.083%
75th percentile0.445%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile144.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%58K
01:00 UTC-2%59K
02:00 UTC-3%57K
03:00 UTC-4%61K
04:00 UTC-6%49K
05:00 UTC-4%48K
06:00 UTC-5%55K
07:00 UTC-4%59K
08:00 UTC-4%69K
09:00 UTC-4%80K
10:00 UTC-3%83K
11:00 UTC-3%90K
12:00 UTC-2%99K
13:00 UTC-2%108K
14:00 UTC-4%111K
15:00 UTC-2%115K
16:00 UTC-4%112K
17:00 UTC-3%104K
18:00 UTC-2%97K
19:00 UTC-2%92K
20:00 UTC-1%86K
21:00 UTC-1%76K
22:00 UTC-2%65K
23:00 UTC-1%59K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%254K
Monday+2%326K
Tuesday-2%350K
Wednesday-4%312K
Thursday-2%265K
Friday-3%274K
Saturday+3%248K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 15, 202633x their median

    Still have absolutely no idea how people watched this in 1999 and said that it sucked. https://t.co/QOxV9btvxF

    26K1.4K2.9K7086.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20267.7x their median

    Peter Cullen, Voice of Optimus Prime in ‘Transformers,’ Dies at 85 https://t.co/ES8Cul9d4u

    4.5K1.4K1501.1K1.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.2x their median

    This is not right. I say it with respect. https://t.co/cz3fgMcS7H

    4.5K21815321422K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.8x their median

    Tim Curry, CLUE: 18 rec 226 yds 3 TDs https://t.co/8PFvzVxED2

    4.1K3507220115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.6x their median

    I took some time this morning and imagined I was a Browns fan. Out of respect. https://t.co/YLBHJ1OXTp

    3.5K45827592255K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.2x their median

    Doing Jon Hamm from The Town, in front of Jon Hamm…. @Jeopardy https://t.co/ufyZaZj64C

    2.9K61525245K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.3x their median

    Talk to em Playmaker😂 https://t.co/dBSxchCth0

    2.0K1241823387K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.0x their median

    Where does he keep his MVP 🏆? And the special whiskey bottle he’s saving until a Super Bowl win 🥃…. https://t.co/dsmv7jzn6l

    1.7K726913166K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.0x their median

    DJ Moore has played with some notable quarterbacks in his career so far 👏 @idjmoore | @BuffaloBills | @KyleBrandt https://t.co/1wgjIk8uz6

    1.7K5542551.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20261.9x their median

    It does look really cool. And I love that there are hundreds of ice cold Labatt Blue 🍁, just feet away. https://t.co/ndULR3uhJC

    1.7K42348107K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bills

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 940 interactions against 500K followers, an engagement rate of 0.188%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 4,273 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 157K times each, and 0.598% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

What is Kyle Brandt's engagement rate on X?
Kyle Brandt (@KyleBrandt) has an engagement rate of 0.188%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 499,938 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.188%, Kyle Brandt sits above the 50th percentile of the 41,299 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KyleBrandt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,273 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KyleBrandt post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going