JADF || (Anticipator) engagement report
@JADF_ - 94K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.6K times each, and 0.265% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 371 interactions, about 21x its own typical post.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #fgo.
Compared with accounts its own size
JADF || (Anticipator)'s engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.019%, JADF || (Anticipator) sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 155.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 238K |
| Monday | 0% | 302K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 302K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 257K |
| Thursday | -2% | 250K |
| Friday | -3% | 259K |
| Saturday | +3% | 233K |
Best tweets
- Jun 25, 202621x their median
Some random ai company is currently mass DMCA-ing twitter artists taking down fan-arts https://t.co/A9M814ygJn
- Jul 18, 202618x their median
Oh wow, now can now add and follow topics of interest on X! 😃 >impreg- "no results" >futan- "no results" >besti- "no results" >henta- "no results" Worthless... 😩
- Jul 1, 20265.9x their median
Good morning, I love VPNs.
- Jul 20, 20264.8x their median
Cup's over, back to work. First things first, I had some commissions unfinished: - Futa Reisen + voodoo doll comic - Gudako x horse comic - Futa shylily ball preg imageset Then, I had some others like: - Poi domming a horse - Shupogaki twincest urethral docking
- Jun 4, 20263.8x their median
After much deliberation, years of taking notes & samples and a ton of math, I recommend keeping your canvas 14.1 cm (height unless wider than 16:9) and then zooming in steps of approximately from 1.1225 through 1.126667 (multiply or divide), and you should be get stellar results.
- Jun 19, 20263.2x their median
Is it just me, or did X just recently really start pushing for these blue checkmark "viral media" posts, or straight up make-believe AI slop with checkmark bots circlejerking with the replies all the way down?
- Jul 20, 20262.5x their median
Spanish Miku, huh? How do you even make that look good? Matador outfits and granny-ass dresses seem like a hard sell. Just red shirt and call it a day? Spain deserved to win for sure, but this could be an international anti-climax tragedy.
- May 24, 20262.2x their median
Today I discovered there's such a thing as "conceptual resolution"; the optimal point at which your artistic brain operates best at, and to which your drawings naturally home into. For me, it's 6009px x 3380px, which with my current UI and monitor translates to 63.8% zoom.
- Jun 22, 20262.2x their median
I like how Youtube is like "☝️🤓 erm, ackshually boredom is GOOD for you, and it can give you the best ideas!", when to someone with a defunct brain and chronically low dopamine base levels it's literally worst poison that makes neurons fire uncontrollably towards distractions.
- Jul 1, 20262.1x their median
Huh? Interesting. Pixiv reverted their decision on payments being processed only at the time of delivery. So basically the payment goes through when the offer is accepted, like it used to over a year ago. Refunds still work as usual.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.6K times each, and 0.265% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 371 interactions, about 21x its own typical post.
- What is JADF || (Anticipator)'s engagement rate on X?
- JADF || (Anticipator) (@JADF_) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 93,942 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.019%, JADF || (Anticipator) sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JADF_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JADF_ post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.