Back to @IzaickF's profile

.π–Žπ–Ÿπ–. engagement report

@IzaickF - 430K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.03%
of 430K followers
Per impression
6.81%
65K views on a typical post
Reach
15.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.746%
485 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4.4K interactions against 430K followers, an engagement rate of 1.03%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 6.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 4.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

.π–Žπ–Ÿπ–.'s engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.03%, .π–Žπ–Ÿπ–. sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,996 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,714 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 20264.1x their median

    Soft cock for eager sluts πŸ˜πŸ’¦ https://t.co/c29634QclR

    16K1.7K11613206K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.5x their median

    He begged to be destroyed before leading the team. Ruthless face fuck with that F.g πŸ’¦ https://t.co/W3u1xJJyrD

    9.8K1.4K4110265K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 20262.5x their median

    Floppy meat packet by the ocean. Looking for desperate dick addicts to tease and edge this thing till it’s a veiny, wrist-thick pussy destroyer 🐷 https://t.co/tEwQstPU43

    10K752562163K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 20262.4x their median

    The way my fat cock flops out before it’s rock hard gets me going every time. Daddy needs to rail your sloppy hole until a you’re ruined. Where’s my eager little cumslut boi ?😏 https://t.co/lM0zdjDmOo

    9.5K9757611191K viewsView on X
  • Apr 1, 20262.2x their median

    If a cute boy walks by right now, I'm dragging him straight into the forest and stuffing him so deep he forgets his own name πŸ·πŸ’¦ https://t.co/n3V3C2yMob

    8.8K848724174K viewsView on X
  • May 17, 20262.2x their median

    No one around, I’m behind the bushes πŸ€€πŸ’¦ https://t.co/89f4RcvuSV

    8.9K741495160K viewsView on X
  • Mar 22, 20262.0x their median

    Gag reflex? Gone. Limits? Laughable πŸ’¦ https://t.co/rnmxZMGOzD

    7.7K1.1K236233K viewsView on X
  • Mar 30, 20261.7x their median

    Turned this F.g’s mouth into a sloppy gape hole. 23min of messy throat fuck πŸ’¦πŸ€€ https://t.co/0HlRAfLX8M

    6.7K896336247K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20261.7x their median

    He saw my bugle so I just told him to put it out https://t.co/Btr6zvnIcL

    6.8K57328287K viewsView on X
  • Apr 19, 20261.6x their median

    His throat became a broken slime machine, covering my cock, hands, and feet in thick drool 🀀 https://t.co/yggel0gjV3

    6.3K687172230K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.4K interactions against 430K followers, an engagement rate of 1.03%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 6.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 4.1x its own typical post.

What is .π–Žπ–Ÿπ–.'s engagement rate on X?
.π–Žπ–Ÿπ–. (@IzaickF) has an engagement rate of 1.03%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 430,145 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.03%, .π–Žπ–Ÿπ–. sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IzaickF have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IzaickF post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

.π–Žπ–Ÿπ–. (@IzaickF) Engagement Rate - 1.03% | PlayerSells