Back to @Glimt's profile

FK Bodø/Glimt engagement report

@Glimt - 88K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.178%
of 88K followers
Per impression
1.98%
7.9K views on a typical post
Reach
8.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
156
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 156 interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 0.178%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 4,124 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.9K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

FK Bodø/Glimt's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,124 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.178%, FK Bodø/Glimt sits above the 50th percentile of the 39,924 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.082% to 0.441%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.082%
p750.441%
p902.08%
p99149.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 39,924 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 93,203 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.082%
75th percentile0.441%
90th percentile2.08%
99th percentile149.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%56K
01:00 UTC-2%57K
02:00 UTC-3%55K
03:00 UTC-4%59K
04:00 UTC-6%47K
05:00 UTC-4%46K
06:00 UTC-4%53K
07:00 UTC-5%57K
08:00 UTC-4%66K
09:00 UTC-4%77K
10:00 UTC-3%79K
11:00 UTC-3%86K
12:00 UTC-2%95K
13:00 UTC-2%103K
14:00 UTC-3%106K
15:00 UTC-2%110K
16:00 UTC-3%107K
17:00 UTC-2%99K
18:00 UTC-2%92K
19:00 UTC-2%87K
20:00 UTC-1%82K
21:00 UTC-1%73K
22:00 UTC-1%63K
23:00 UTC-1%56K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%247K
Monday+1%316K
Tuesday-3%332K
Wednesday-3%282K
Thursday-2%257K
Friday-3%268K
Saturday+3%241K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202624x their median

    NESTE STOPP: CHAMPIONS LEAGUE 😭💛🤝 https://t.co/bqOp7py1M8

    3.4K2175639205K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202622x their median

    Champions League 2026/27 💛🕺 https://t.co/XOZ6ZE0xsV

    3.2K1313718956K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20269.9x their median

    Det er med stor sorg vi har mottatt budskapet om at Hans Majestet Kong Harald er død. Våre varmeste tanker går til alle medlemmer av Kongehuset. Takk for alt. https://t.co/jcYD67mkU8

    1.5K6210230K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20269.4x their median

    Champions League, baby! 🔥 https://t.co/N6g3tA43hR

    1.4K8021319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20268.7x their median

    Dæven, det blir deilig det her 🔥 👋 @atletienglish @FCBayern @BlackYellow @ClubBrugge @losclive @sscnapoli @LASK_Official @RCLens https://t.co/1po3SGVbzP

    1.2K77231847K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.1x their median

    💛 https://t.co/xP0th8vO1U

    59130667.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.8x their median

    Fin ettermiddag på Aspmyra 💛🇳🇴 https://t.co/sZzCoOYlJz

    41815006.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.8x their median

    Bjørkan og Auklend sørget for 2-0 like før pause! Det liker vi 😍 https://t.co/LU3EdDmAI6

    405151018.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.7x their median

    Scenen er satt ▶️ https://t.co/LF9ZwOeYDr

    400126111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.5x their median

    Verdens fineste Champions League-by 😍 https://t.co/gRxJbQcbne

    370213211K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 156 interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 0.178%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 4,124 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.9K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is FK Bodø/Glimt's engagement rate on X?
FK Bodø/Glimt (@Glimt) has an engagement rate of 0.178%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 87,864 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.178%, FK Bodø/Glimt sits above the 50th percentile of the 39,924 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Glimt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,124 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Glimt post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going