GemsOfINDOLOGY engagement report
@GemsOfINDOLOGY - 99K followers on X
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 264 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.267%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 5.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 61x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #archaeology, #civilisation, #gemsofasi.
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026. Recurring tags: #archaeology, #civilisation, #gemsofasi.
Compared with accounts its own size
GemsOfINDOLOGY's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.267%, GemsOfINDOLOGY sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 156.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 238K |
| Monday | 0% | 302K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 302K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 257K |
| Thursday | -2% | 250K |
| Friday | -3% | 259K |
| Saturday | +3% | 233K |
Best tweets
- Jul 21, 202661x their median
Mesopotamia was never the cradle of civilisation. India was. I spent forty years in international shipping, not academia. When I began researching the history of maritime trade, I had no orthodoxy to defend. I followed the evidence, and it kept arriving in the same place: the Indian subcontinent. Nineteenth century archaeologists dug in Mesopotamia because the climate preserved artefacts, the biblical sources pointed them there, and the Ottomans allowed the excavations. That is the entire basis for the myth of Mesopotamia as "the cradle of civilisation." Nobody applied the same rigour to India. Mohenjo-daro was not discovered until 1922. By then the narrative had already hardened. What was actually there was the largest civilisation of the ancient world. Three hundred cities. Fifty thousand people in each, by 2600 BC. Two thirds of them stood on the banks of the Sarasvati, the central and greatest of the seven rivers described in the Rig Veda, flowing down from the Himalayas before the river vanished entirely by 1900 BC. The Vedic kings claimed territory stretching "sea to sea," from Afghanistan to Maharashtra, some 1.5 million square miles, against Egypt's 13,000. A dock at Lothal built to handle thirty ships of sixty tons, unmatched in Europe for four thousand years. When it was first excavated, it was recorded as a bathing pool. When the scale became impossible to dismiss, the theory was not corrected. It was replaced with a story of pale-skinned nomads from the steppe who supposedly arrived around 1500 BC and brought civilisation with them. There is no evidence. The chronology doesn't work. The Vedas describe no invasion. In 2019 a Harvard-led genetic study revived the claim, and the press reported it as confirmation. It was not. The same study found the builders of these cities were indigenous. The Sarasvati river that the Rig Veda described had already dried up before these newcomers arrived. What the study also found is that a small group of men, arriving after the Sarasvati had already dried up, interbred with the existing population and left a genetic signature. That is all. So, where they chose to dig was mostly an accident of climate and access. The Aryan invasion theory was constructed because an Indian civilisation that owed nothing to Caucasians was a fact the late nineteenth century could not accommodate. Link to full Substack essay with sources in the comments below.
- Jun 27, 202633x their median
Located in Hisar (Haryana), Rakhigarhi is the largest known archaeological site of the Indus-Saraswati Civilisation, spanning approximately 550 hectares, significantly larger than both Harappa and Mohenjo-daro. Major excavations at the site have revealed advanced urban planning, sophisticated craftsmanship, a large lapidary workshop, drainage systems, wells, and a substantial cemetery. Many scholars believe it may have served as a major provincial capital or an important regional center of the Indus-Saraswati Civilisation. These discoveries firmly establish that the heart and largest expanse of the Indus-Saraswati Civilisation thrived across a vast area of Bharat. Ongoing research and preservation efforts at Rakhigarhi continue to provide deeper insights into this ancient civilisation and its profound roots in Indian history. #Rakhigarhi #IndusSaraswatiCivilisation #LargestIndusSite #AncientIndianHeritage #CivilisationalContinuity @ASIGoI
- Jul 10, 202615x their median
7,000 years before Egypt attempted it, Bharat reconciled 13 lunar months with the solar year. The evidence is carved into Ratnagiri Petroglyph — 13 grooves, horizon line, astronomical precision. It sits exposed. Endangered. Documented but unprotected. If this stone survives monsoon and vandalism, it's the earliest solar-lunar calendar reconciliation on record. Globally. We fund ₹4,000 crore annual ASI budgets. We cannot afford a roof. The oldest astronomical knowledge crumbles under open sky while we debate which colonial monument needs another coat of paint. 🪨☀️🌙 Who decided 7,000 years wasn't old enough to matter?
- Jul 25, 202612x their median
We gave Elephanta's caves UNESCO status. We buried the reservoir that made the island survivable for 1,500 years. March 2026. ASI digs 5 meters down. 20 stone steps emerge. Massive T-shaped structure. Stone blocks ferried from the mainland across open water. Why? Because Elephanta's rocky terrain couldn't hold monsoon rain. Water ran straight into the sea. So they engineered a solution. 💧🏗️ But here's what we remember: The 5th-century Shiva caves. UNESCO World Heritage. Tourists. Guides. Postcards. What we forgot: The reservoir that made the settlement possible. The 3 port localities — Morabandar, Rajbandar, Shethbandar. The 3,000 amphorae sherds from the Mediterranean. The torpedo jars from Mesopotamia carrying wine, oil, fish sauce. The dyeing vats for textiles. The 60 coins. Kalachuri dynasty. 6th century CE. Ruler Krishnaraja. This wasn't a temple island. It was a thriving maritime trade hub with Mediterranean connections, sophisticated water engineering, and textile production. The caves were the ceremony. The reservoir was the civilization. We celebrate the art. We bury the infrastructure that made it survivable. Excavation began November 2025. Discovery made March 2026. 1,500 years it waited beneath the soil. How many more reservoirs, ports, workshops are we standing on? Who decided only temples deserved memory?
- Jul 11, 20268.2x their median
1990. Road widening work uncovers petroglyphs at Nivli Fata, Ratnagiri. Officials from the Directorate of Archaeology AND Archaeological Survey of India are immediately notified. This becomes the first reported petroglyph site in Konkan. Scholars rush in. Books are published. Comparisons drawn to Harappan civilization. An entire academic field of Konkan petroglyph studies is born from this one discovery. The site itself? Still half-buried under road construction. 36 years later. Not neglected by accident. Not lost to time. Not awaiting discovery. Reported to two official bodies in 1990. Documented in RTI responses. Still under asphalt. We widened the road. ✅ We triggered an academic renaissance. ✅ We preserved the site that started it all. ❌ The first petroglyph that launched a thousand studies remains buried under the road we chose to finish. Who decided tarmac matters more than the stone that rewrote Konkan's prehistory? 🛣️🪨
- Jul 5, 20266.6x their median
World's first pathological dinosaur egg. 30 nests. 66 million years. Globally irreplaceable. Broken fence. No guard. We're surveying the rock for limestone. --- India has a titanosaur nesting site that yielded the world's first ovum-in-ovo pathology in a dinosaur. The fence is broken. No signage. Outcrops scratched by wandering visitors. GSI's own RTI-disclosed fieldwork report from December 2023 describes fossil samples "lying in the open without any care or maintenance." Their last systematic paleontological programme on this formation: 2000-02. The two most recent GSI entries for the same rock unit are limestone exploration surveys. We are prospecting the rock that holds the world's first dinosaur pathological egg for construction material. Three agencies orbit this site. None owns the broken fence. A Geoheritage proposal is pending. The nests are not.
- Jul 15, 20266.3x their median
They were called Devadasis. Temple dancers. Court performers. Keepers of Bharatanatyam, Kathak, Odissi. Professional artists. Economically independent. Culturally respected for centuries. Then the British arrived. Victorian England had two categories for women: Private = respectable (confined to home) Public = prostitute (visible in society) No third option. When they saw Indian women performing publicly, earning money, moving freely in courts and temples— Their moral framework short-circuited. "Women. In public. Earning income. Must be prostitutes." So they administratively reclassified an entire artistic profession. Nautch Girl. Public Woman. Prostitute. Three words. Same woman. Degrading with each translation. Look at the evidence. 🖼️ Their attire. Their instruments. Their posture. Do they look like what the label claims? Or do they look like what they were—artists? The Contagious Diseases Acts followed. Criminal Tribes Act followed. Surveillance. Licensing. Rescue missions. An entire classical tradition moralized out of existence. Today? We still say "nautch girl" casually. Still carry the Victorian stigma. Still use their vocabulary to describe our artists. 150 years later. Whose morality are we speaking? 🎭
- Jul 23, 20266.1x their median
You call it hathi. Your great-great-grandfather called it hathi. The Rigveda, 3,000+ years ago, called it hastin mriga — "the one with a hand." Same word. Same soil. Unbroken. But we learned elephant, rhinoceros, hippopotamus in school — Latin names for African animals. We memorized their Greek roots for biology class. No one taught us that hathi comes from hastin. That the word we speak daily is older than most civilizations. We were trained to see ourselves as disconnected from that past. Meanwhile, the language never forgot. 🐘 How many other words are we speaking without knowing they're 3,000-year-old survivors?
- Aug 4, 20263.1x their median
Harappan seal shows Master of Animals motif. Historian: Clearly inspired by Mesopotamia. Konkan rock art shows same motif — 12,000 years old. Same historian: ... The pattern isn't the motif. It's the direction we're trained to see influence flowing. When India resembles Mesopotamia → borrowed. When India predates Mesopotamia → silence. Not because the evidence is weak. Because the framework only allows diffusion to flow one way: West to East. Never the reverse. 12,000 BP: Konkan rock art, Master of Animals. 5,000 BP: Harappan seals, Master of Animals. 4,000 BP: Mesopotamian iconography, Master of Animals. The dates don't just challenge the theory. They invert it. Yet textbooks still say Harappa "borrowed" from Mesopotamia. No one asks if Mesopotamia borrowed from an older Indian tradition. We don't deny influence existed. We deny it only flowed one direction. 🗿 Who decided older evidence in India means coincidence, but similarity means derivation?
- Aug 8, 20262.8x their median
We protect European gravestones as monuments of national importance. The same Europeans who suppressed our independence. Meanwhile, 40,000-year-old rock art crumbles under open sky because documentation budgets don't exist. We maintain their memory better than our own ancestors. 🪦 Who decided which stones deserve protection? #GemsofASI MNI356
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 264 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.267%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 5.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 61x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #archaeology, #civilisation, #gemsofasi.
- What is GemsOfINDOLOGY's engagement rate on X?
- GemsOfINDOLOGY (@GemsOfINDOLOGY) has an engagement rate of 0.267%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 98,895 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.267%, GemsOfINDOLOGY sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GemsOfINDOLOGY have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GemsOfINDOLOGY post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.