Back to @real_bill_gross's profile

Bill Gross engagement report

@real_bill_gross - 470K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.021%
of 470K followers
Per impression
0.61%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
3.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
96
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 470K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 68x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.021%, Bill Gross sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 329 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 8, 202568x their median

    This market “crash” will affect millennial and Gen Z investors for long to come. What before was a can’t miss way to make money will induce caution and more conservative attitudes, resulting in lower P/E ratios, higher yields, and low single-digit returns.

    4.8K553903193785K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202436x their median

    Hard to measure but I suspect upper middle class and wealthy boomers are funding millennials and younger generational spending by transferring assets/cash and paying bills, and in the process pumping retail sales and the economy. In essence they are liquidating balance sheets to pay for spending. This is likely to continue as long as stocks/housing prices stay elevated.

    2.8K311264103679K viewsView on X
  • Apr 9, 202527x their median

    My portfolio of defensive stocks is green so I don’t begrudge today’s market. But I ask you, would you want to own highly volatile US stocks whose price depends on whether POTUS had a good night’s sleep and woke up the next morning to reverse yesterday’s policies?

    2.1K26820843208K viewsView on X
  • Apr 3, 202526x their median

    As I told Bloomberg, this is an epic economic and market event similar to 1971 and the end of the gold standard except with immediate negative consequences. Investors should not try to “catch a falling knife”. Today’s appealing “bargains” will be around tomorrow and the next day. https://t.co/Uzop0rA3Gi Trump can’t back down anytime soon — he’s too macho for that. Buying domestic companies such as T, VZ and MO for relatively safe dividends in a falling interest rate world. Even with these be careful — they are approaching “overbought” territory.

    2.0K3376970366K viewsView on X
  • Apr 4, 202522x their median

    The US financial markets are highly levered and that leverage is unwinding without value considerations. ETFs when sold sell everything. Still wait for this falling levered knife to hit bottom. Next week may present opportunities.

    1.7K2268141235K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202418x their median

    Cliff Asness of AQR has written an interesting paper available online. Basically he asserts markets are now less efficient due to index funds, low interest rates, and most importantly the influence of access to technology that encourages memes and meme philosophy that increases the attractiveness of markets that have gone up and decreases valuations of those that haven’t. Momentum as an alpha contributor perhaps has gained influence versus value etc etc Trends that have gone on recently such as high PE’s and outperformance of US stocks versus others may be influenced by these factors. Good read by @CliffordAsness https://t.co/SDOAp10P8g

    1.4K2224744357K viewsView on X
  • May 4, 202518x their median

    At Pimco/Pacific Life I and others helped give Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger one of their first loans to a down-and-out Berkshire Hathaway in the mid 70s. I knew nothing about insurance and candy stores but was sold by his long-term vision of the economy and markets. Congratulations my friend -- not just on the numbers -- but on the philanthropy and the years. Having a cherry Coke with you was a highlight of my career.

    1.5K1074710156K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202417x their median

    Too much leverage in the global financial system with Japanese yen strength and overdone treasury yield declines a key to the unwind. I’m not buying the small recovery from morning bottoms. Not selling either. Markets too volatile with bid/ask spreads extremely wide.

    1.4K1814735240K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202514x their median

    Regional bank “cockroaches” may continue to affect stocks AND bonds. 10 year Treasury has no business below 4% though 4.5% more like it — too much supply/deficits despite slowing, soon-to-be 1% growth economy. Gold has become a momentum/meme asset. If you want to own it, wait awhile.

    1.1K2067130275K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202513x their median

    Long-term research indicates US 10 year has traded at CPI plus 175. With inflation at 2.5% that puts a 10 year at 4.25% or so. That was history — but deficits/ensuing supply of bonds/and a weak dollar should keep CPI from falling below 2.5% and the 10 year from falling below 4.25%. Stocks are AI dominated and continue to suggest 1-2% economic growth despite tariffs and geopolitical unrest. I suggest a “little bull market” for stocks and a “little bear market” for bonds. Nothing dramatic either way for now.

    9921865218212K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 470K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 68x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Bill Gross's engagement rate on X?
Bill Gross (@real_bill_gross) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 469,902 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.021%, Bill Gross sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @real_bill_gross have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @real_bill_gross post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going