Back to @paulwesley's profile

Paul Wesley engagement report

@paulwesley - 3.5M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 3.5M followers
Per impression
0.491%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
0.41%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
71
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 3.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 1 original post, its engagement rate beats 16% of tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.491% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.413% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 89x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #jamestkirk, #startrekstrangenewworlds, #captainkirk. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #jamestkirk, #startrekstrangenewworlds, #captainkirk.

Compared with accounts its own size

Paul Wesley's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count. A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Paul Wesley sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Mar 9, 202689x their median

    Hidden on page 744 of the farm bill the House Agriculture Committee passed Thursday is a provision that would condemn millions of pigs to a lifetime in gestation crates. Rebranded the 'Save Our Bacon Act,' it's a pork-industry play to wipe out every state law banning the sale of pork from crated pigs — laws the conservative Supreme Court upheld in 2023. Over 85% of Democrats and Republicans oppose these crates. Voters have backed ballot measures to ban them in state after state. The pork industry knows it can't win a straight vote on this. So it's burying the provision in an 800-page bill and hoping no one notices. Contact your senators and representative today and tell them: oppose the farm bill unless the Save Our Bacon Act is stripped out. You can reach them at https://t.co/MQvByA4atR and https://t.co/v6ghw99u1K — it takes two minutes and it matters.

    26K12K1.1K1.1K5.3M viewsView on X
  • May 3, 202683x their median

    He isn't serial code YPP5. He's James. And he's on his way to his new family. https://t.co/eHlknvJ8jS

    33K3.7K1.0K216311K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 2019296x their median

    https://t.co/MsOJorJTfz

    20K70063043View on X
  • Jan 30, 202391x their median

    I am deeply saddened to hear about the passing of Annie Wersching. She was a wonderful and talented person I was lucky enough to know. Please consider contributing to the Gofundme page set up in her name. https://t.co/wLtySmm7kH

    5.7K56411255363K viewsView on X
  • Mar 20, 202673x their median

    pls sign and share this petition to have sweet opal relocated to a sanctuary - she is all alone :( https://t.co/IY8hiYh7LI https://t.co/NlEixFrWzZ

    3.4K1.7K3950787K viewsView on X
  • Apr 19, 202311x their median

    Greetings from such great heights 🖖 #StarTrek #StrangeNewWorlds Season 2 premieres June 15 on @ParamountPlus! https://t.co/V1WdJfSWEL

    3.2K868166789925K viewsView on X
  • Apr 29, 20269.2x their median

    Dogs being brutally rounded up & slaughtered in Morocco ahead of the next World Cup this is a disgrace to the human race https://t.co/siY6OYPpKt

    2.3K1.4K32811189K viewsView on X
  • Mar 20, 20268.7x their median

    We must do everything we can to bring the worlds attention to the horrific slaughter of dogs happening in Morocco in preparation for @FIFAWorldCup please follow & support the great work being done by @iawpcoalition https://t.co/iTHe1HVty2

    2.5K1.4K192931K viewsView on X
  • Apr 4, 20267.5x their median

    just a friday night at the world’s most famous arena https://t.co/FA4EAbhpUu

    3.1K2113020243K viewsView on X
  • Nov 25, 202234x their median

    Honored! Thank you @THR @brothersbond https://t.co/kfo8fpf8hV https://t.co/KaVc0nZLW7

    2.2K173562View on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#jamestkirk#startrekstrangenewworlds#captainkirk#startrek#strangenewworlds

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 3.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 1 original post, its engagement rate beats 16% of tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.491% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.413% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 89x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #jamestkirk, #startrekstrangenewworlds, #captainkirk. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Paul Wesley's engagement rate on X?
Paul Wesley (@paulwesley) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,500,180 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Paul Wesley sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @paulwesley have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count, which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @paulwesley post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going