Back to @migueldeicaza's profile

Miguel de Icaza α―…πŸ‰ engagement report

@migueldeicaza - 99K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.9%
of 99K followers
Per impression
0.953%
94K views on a typical post
Reach
94.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
894
interactions (median)
Saved
0.109%
102 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.57/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 894 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.9%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 94K times each, and 0.953% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 94.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 53x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Miguel de Icaza α―…πŸ‰'s engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.9%, Miguel de Icaza α―…πŸ‰ sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.434% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 202653x their median

    In 1998, Bill Clinton ended 30 years of deficits, bringing the federal budget to zero deficit. He went on to deliver record surpluses, 22.7M jobs, 4% unemployment, and the longest peacetime expansion. https://t.co/HVXWJstc6v

    38K4.1K3.7K87610M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202617x their median

    πŸš¨πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ ANOTHER VICTORY: A British jury refused to convict 7 Palestine Action defendants in the latest Filton 25 trial. They took direct action against 'israel's' largest private arms manufacturer -Elbit Systems- in Bristol, August 2024. The British public has spoken πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈβœŠπŸΌ https://t.co/dWugBgML5I

    11K3.7K21570126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202611x their median

    bit on the nose https://t.co/8rLgDqCxkM

    8.9K8341315127K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202610x their median

    Hasan Piker makes a statement on whether he will campaign with Angie Nixon: "Going forward, this is an Angie Nixon stan account. If Angie Nixon wants our help, we'll be there for her. If she wants it to be, on the background, I will do that. If she says, 'I don't know Hasan Piker. I don't want him anywhere near,' I will never touch the state of Florida. I will never bring it up. Whatever she wants, we are her loyal soldiers, okay?"

    8.6K4423431302K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20269.0x their median

    πŸ”₯NEW: Ex-Biden Aide Michael LaRosa *FIRES BACK* at Michigan Dem C-SPAN Caller who rips him for attacking Abdul El-SayedπŸ”₯ Caller: "As a Democratic strategist coming on a national program, I think that’s totally UNACCEPTABLE β€” and I think that you’re doing a DISSERVICE!" LaRosa: "I could NEVER support El-Sayed ... if you're too COWARDLY and too WEAK to stand up to somebody who JUSTIFIES terrorism, 9/11, the suffering of people ... this guy doesn’t have it in him to say it’s WRONG to say that." "The test of leadership is NOT standing up to the other side. That’s EASY to do. It's standing up to your FRIENDS. And he's too much of a COWARD to do it." Major props to Michael LaRosa for putting his principles over his party. It shows true courage. He's taking tons of heat from his own side β€” including multiple callers during his appearance here on @cspanwj.

    6.5K977464113329K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20267.2x their median

    received a message that evil ass g**gle has restricted access to Palestine Film Index due to some anonymous complaint. there are backups to a point, as we had intuited this would likely happen. will be requesting a β€œreview” but will also be working to get it back online elsewhere https://t.co/aJqtnhxGXp

    5.0K1.4K340357K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.0x their median

    Introducing terminal-code: VS Code inside the terminal - VS Code compatible CLI - works over ssh - syncs with your terminal theme https://t.co/j3HThPdVPw https://t.co/tV0FOB7WrH

    5.2K4053553601.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.6x their median

    This is wild. In every single one of these countries, China is now viewed more favourably than the US. It represents a shift in favourability in *all* cases. https://t.co/IegYlnwkEu

    3.8K882152190198K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.2x their median

    Whoever made this is a genius πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/7X2Wel3C6F

    3.1K48312092234K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.4x their median

    Here’s my review of Qwen 3.8 27B - I can't remember the last time I've had this much fun playing with a local model that runs on my own computers https://t.co/iFMWjc8qle

    2.7K22712438241K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 894 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.9%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 94K times each, and 0.953% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 94.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 53x its own typical post.

What is Miguel de Icaza α―…πŸ‰'s engagement rate on X?
Miguel de Icaza α―…πŸ‰ (@migueldeicaza) has an engagement rate of 0.9%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 99,441 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.9%, Miguel de Icaza α―…πŸ‰ sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @migueldeicaza have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @migueldeicaza post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going