Back to @ice_blockchain's profile

Ice Open Network engagement report

@ice_blockchain - 2.5M followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.029%
of 2.5M followers
Per impression
0.999%
72K views on a typical post
Reach
2.93%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
720
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 720 interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Posts are seen about 72K times each, and 0.999% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #ion.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Ice Open Network sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,146 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video17% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 17% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 795 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 13, 20264.5x their median

    ✨ After listening to the community, we’ve made our decision: We stay. We build. We win. We’re restructuring the company from the ground up. Cutting waste. Dropping distractions. Doubling down on what actually matters. No more dead weight. No more inefficient spending. No more side paths. Just a leaner team, better execution, and total focus on scaling. This is not the end of anything. It’s the beginning of a stronger chapter. $ION is here to stay. The road to $1B market cap begins now.

    1.9K347894128224K viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 20263.0x their median

    🧑‍💻 An Update from the CEO Over the last two days, we made the decision to continue — and more importantly, we acted on it. We have already restructured the company and reduced operating costs from roughly $400,000 per month to around $45,000 per month. This was not easy, but it was necessary. We moved fast, cut deep, and focused only on what is essential. The last four years taught us many lessons, but one stands above all: A good idea means nothing if execution is too slow. That is the lesson we are taking forward into this next chapter. Our priority now is simple: focus on a fresh direction that can rebuild trust in the community while also generating real revenue for the company. We are no longer interested in wasting time, energy, or capital on anything that does not directly move us closer to product-market fit and sustainable growth. I will personally be joining the development effort to help bring this next product to market as fast as possible and to work directly with the team on execution. We are not going to repeat the mistake of overpromising before delivery. We will not reveal what we are building until it is ready. For those who still believe in us, stay with us a little longer — and when the time comes, we will show you. To move faster, we will be building this product in a closed-source environment during development. That decision is purely about speed and execution. Right now, shipping matters more than optics. Once we are live, we can focus on opening things up properly. We are now a smaller team, made up primarily of developers, and our time will be spent exactly where it should be spent: building. No distractions. No wasted effort. No unnecessary overhead. Just execution. Whether people choose to stand with us or not, we are moving forward with this plan. We are going to take this shot and see it through. Once the product is live, it will be something that can be marketed far beyond the crypto industry, which gives us a much stronger path toward real adoption and sustainable company revenue. At this moment, the company still holds a little over 1 billion $ION. These tokens will be used only to cover essential development and infrastructure costs. Because the previous service agreement has ended and that external funding is no longer available, we will be activating an automatic daily sale of $1,500 worth of tokens to help fund operations at the current market price. This is not a choice we make lightly, but it is the practical path that allows us to keep building over the coming months. Over the next 4 to 8 weeks, you should expect to see major changes across the website, the whitepaper, and most importantly, the launch of the first version of the new product. Our goal is clear: go live fast, get real feedback fast, and scale 10x faster than we did in the past. What we are building is a real utility product with real-world use, something unique within crypto and something we believe the market genuinely needs. Once it goes live, we believe adoption can accelerate faster than anything we have done before — because for the first time, our growth will be driven by real utility and real demand, not just belief alone. To everyone who has stood by us for the past four years: thank you. Give us 4 to 8 more weeks. That is all we ask. Stay with us, watch what we build, and witness how we turn the hardest moment in this project’s history into the foundation of its strongest chapter. We are still here. We are still building. And we are not done yet. Thank you for the support.

    1.2K201574140172K viewsView on X
  • Apr 12, 20262.9x their median

    🚨 An Update from the CEO I want to speak openly about the situation we are facing. For more than four years, our company has operated out of the BVI without a traditional bank account. Throughout that time, the business was funded primarily through token-based agreements. That meant development, infrastructure, marketing, legal, and many other operational costs were covered through tokens rather than fiat. This was possible because we worked with a service provider who believed deeply in our vision and agreed to support the project in exchange for tokens. For over four years, that provider stood by us and helped us build. However, due to recent market conditions, he lost confidence in the project and decided to claim tokens that were scheduled to unlock after two years, on 7 April. That event triggered the crash you have seen and brought our collaboration with him to an end. It has also placed the company in a very difficult position. Over the past four years, the total cost of building this project has exceeded $18,000,000 USD. We have invoices, records, and audit trails for every expense. During this entire period, @ice_z3us, @robertpreoteasa, and @ice_apoll0 did not take salaries, because we believed in the long-term vision and chose to keep building. As many of you know, under our tokenomics, the team managed approximately 4.2 billion tokens across the team, treasury, and ecosystem allocations. Because the monthly operating costs of the project were so high, we entered into a long-term agreement with the service provider under which he would receive a larger amount of tokens after two years in return for supporting the business and helping us scale. That structure was meant to buy us time to build properly and reach a stronger position. The reality is that the cost of operating the project became far greater than what could reasonably be recovered. The provider ultimately lost money on the arrangement, and after investing around $18,000,000, he chose to exit and sell the tokens he was entitled to. That is what brought us to where we are today. At this moment, the company still holds a little over 1 billion tokens. As the attached data shows, and based on the average prices at which the provider sold in recent days, it is clear that the company has been operating at a loss from the very beginning. Even so, we kept going because we truly believed in the project. We have seen many accusations claiming that we, as a team, dumped tokens on the community. That is simply not true. What happened was the termination of an agreement with a long-term service provider, and that outcome has now been reflected in the market. The project's current operating cost is around $400,000 per month. Many people do not realize how expensive it is to keep a project like this alive at scale. Even if every token we had received had been sold, it still would not have fully covered the total costs and obligations of the business. We never lied when we said we believed in this project. In fact, we are the ones who have been hurt the most by this situation. Because I want to remain fully transparent, I have to say this clearly: we are now reviewing whether it is possible to reduce costs significantly over the coming weeks, potentially by half. If we continue operating, it may require us to sell part of the remaining treasury tokens to cover essential expenses. We are no longer in a position where we can keep absorbing losses indefinitely, especially after already carrying losses of roughly $8 million. What happens next depends on whether the project still has real support from the market and the community. We will watch the coming days carefully and assess whether there is enough confidence and momentum for us to continue building. If there is, we will keep going. If there is not, we will be forced to consider shutting the project down. And if that happens, I want to be clear: we will burn our remaining tokens, not sell them. It is also important for the community to understand how much of the unlocked token supply was used to support the ecosystem. Out of the 4.2 billion tokens managed across these years, more than 900 million tokens were used for exchange campaigns, KOLs, and liquidity. Many people ask for listings, but few understand what listings actually require: exchange liquidity, market making, campaigns, promotions, and other associated costs. These are real costs, and they are substantial. There is another truth I have avoided discussing publicly until now, but I believe it is important to say it. Exchanges do not value all user bases equally. Large user numbers from Tier 3 countries did not help with listings in the way many people assumed. In many cases, exchanges specifically asked us for performance and user metrics excluding those regions. This is an uncomfortable reality of the industry, but it is a reality nonetheless. In the images attached, I have also shared detailed costs, including what different exchanges charged us and how many tokens were required for marketing and listing-related activity. I want people to better understand how this industry really works. We have nothing to hide, and the exchanges involved can confirm the commercial structures. I am deeply saddened that we are in this position, but I owe you the truth. The documentation is there. The records are there. The transaction history is there. If anything, we are the ones who lost the most trying to make this vision real.

    859168863180326K viewsView on X
  • Mar 23, 20262.7x their median

    🚀 $ION x #Kucoin Listing goes live on @kucoincom tomorrow. ⏰ 24 March at 10:00 UTC https://t.co/zwGQkmxtFM

    1.4K2782354387K viewsView on X
  • Mar 2, 20261.8x their median

    🚀 The listing of $ION is just the first step. After completing the migration from $ICE to $ION, we are entering the next phase of Ice Open Network. ION is more than a token. It powers an ecosystem built around tokenized communities, social interaction, and integrated crypto functionality. 🧩 After months of development, Tokenized Communities are about to go live. This framework enables creators and projects to launch and trade their own tokens directly through https://t.co/3cMilKYyF3 and the @pumpit_now browser extension, transforming communities into tradable on-chain ecosystems. 🔥 #ION is the core utility asset across both products. It is used as the main trading pair, powers every transaction and on-chain action, and each interaction contributes to burning $ION, supporting a sustainable deflationary model. Built on @BNBCHAIN, this is where real utility meets scale. And this is only the beginning.

    1.2K263234188269K viewsView on X
  • May 7, 20262.6x their median

    ✨ Some of you may think we went silent because we stopped working on ION. We didn’t. As we said weeks ago, we are still here, still building, and still fighting to put the project back on the right path. Yes, the team is smaller now. But I still believe this team is capable of doing something powerful once the work we’ve been doing is ready to be shown publicly. In the past, you were used to weekly bulletins, timelines, updates, and constant transparency. That changes now. We will no longer share every step, every internal milestone, or every expected timeline before things are ready. We learned the hard way that too much transparency can sometimes create more damage than trust, especially when technical delays happen and people turn unfinished work into FUD. This period may look difficult from the outside, but I believe it will make the community stronger. It will separate the noise from the believers, the bad mouths from the builders, and the short-term panic from the long-term vision. Our focus now is simple: build products that generate real revenue, so we never end up in this position again. Big changes are coming. The website will be updated. The whitepaper will be updated. And when the time is right, the new direction will be clear. One lesson I learned personally: never brag before the product is ready. If what we are building was easy, everyone would have done it already. Right now, words will not convince everyone. And that is fine. Because if our plan works and we execute it properly, the results will speak louder than any post. We are not building only for crypto users. We are building something that can scale beyond crypto, cheaper, faster, and with real utility. Silence does not mean surrender. It means focus. Zeus

    1.1K2194374893K viewsView on X
  • Mar 3, 2026

    🚀 $ION is now live on PancakeSwap. Following the successful migration from $ICE to $ION, trading is officially open on @BNBCHAIN. Over $1.5M in liquidity has been added, providing a strong foundation for the next phase of growth. 📈 Additional exchange listings are coming soon. This is more than a relisting. It marks the transition into the next stage of the Ice Open Network ecosystem. 🧩 Tokenized Communities are entering the final phase of testing. After months of development, the framework powering community-driven tokens inside https://t.co/3cMilKY0Pv and @PUMPit_now is close to launch. $ION is the core utility behind it all, powering transactions, trading pairs, and on-chain activity across the ecosystem. Each transaction contributes to burning $ION, reinforcing a sustainable deflationary model as usage grows. The next chapter starts now. CA: 0xE1ab61f7b093435204dF32F5b3A405de55445Ea8

    1.1K24536457221K viewsView on X
  • Apr 1, 20262.5x their median

    🤖 As part of our shift to AI-first development, we’re taking transparency to the next level. Starting next week, the new repositories built with AI will begin going public, so everyone can see in real time how fast things move in this new development era. This is not about code being public. It’s about showing the speed at which we build, iterate, and ship. 📈 At the same time, we’re expanding $ION to new exchanges next week, increasing access and liquidity as we move into this next phase. More surprises coming.

    1.2K2322566864K viewsView on X
  • Mar 11, 20262.5x their median

    👻 Some of you have been with us since day one — 4 years in. You know our style: we ship, and sometimes we ship surprises that aren’t on the roadmap, but belong in the ecosystem. Tomorrow is a big day. We’re launching an amazing new product together with @baomarkets, with $ION integrated as real utility + a burn mechanism from day one. To keep the community hot, we’re pushing the beta build tomorrow to our closed group, and they’ll be posting real feedback, including videos and screenshots directly in the comments. This marks the first official rollout of $ION utility + burning, soon to launch in production. And with Tokenized Communities coming on https://t.co/df3J920WB1 + PUMPit, you’ll see the biggest wave of utility-driven adoption and burning we’ve had so far. And to the dedicated FUD squad — keep going. You’re giving us free marketing. 🔥

    1.2K2582495190K viewsView on X
  • Mar 10, 20262.4x their median

    🚀 $ION x #BingX Listing goes live tomorrow (11 March) at 10:00 UTC on @BingXOfficial. Stay close — one more big announcement drops later today, and we’ve got more announcements coming over the next couple of days. 🔥 https://t.co/6NKjSrnQEr https://t.co/jK2oCjba8Y

    1.2K26719857102K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ion

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 720 interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Posts are seen about 72K times each, and 0.999% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Ice Open Network's engagement rate on X?
Ice Open Network (@ice_blockchain) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,461,404 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Ice Open Network sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ice_blockchain have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ice_blockchain post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going