Alex Falcon engagement report
@iamalexfalcon - 1.4M followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.086% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 113 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Alex Falcon's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Alex Falcon sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 80% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 1299 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 6, 202611x their median
Pavel Durov’s $1.7 billion crypto play Toncoin jumped 19.5% in a single day. The reason? Durov announced that the project is bringing back its original name: Gram. To understand why this matters, it is needed to go back to the beginning. ❌ What happened in 2018 Telegram raised $1.7 billion to create its own cryptocurrency, Gram. The idea was global: a payment system inside the messenger, like WeChat Pay in China, but built on crypto. But in 2019, U.S. regulators shut the project down. Durov paid a fine and officially walked away from Gram. ✅ But a solution was found The project's code remained open-source. “Independent developers” continued working on it under a new name: Toncoin. Legally, it was no longer part of Telegram. From there, Durov gradually started bringing the cryptocurrency back: a wallet the messenger, transfers, creator payouts, mini apps. No big announcements. No unnecessary noise. ❓ Why bring back the name now? Telegram is building a super app: advertising, donations, transfers, games, online stores — all inside the messenger. To make that work, it needs its own currency. And Gram is the brand that could once again become the centerpiece of that ecosystem.
- Jul 14, 20265.0x their median
Strategy finally sold Bitcoin For years, Strategy has been buying Bitcoin with money raised from investors, promising them regular payouts. Roughly speaking, it's similar to bonds: you lend money to the company, and in return you receive a fixed payment in U.S. dollars every quarter. This week, one of those payments came due, but the company didn't have enough cash on hand. For the first time, it sold part of its Bitcoin holdings — 3,588 BTC, for about $216 million. Technically, that's just 0.4% of its total Bitcoin holdings, which isn't much. However, the company's payment obligations continue to grow. And if the company ultimately changes its approach and begins selling off its Bitcoin holdings, it could easily become the trigger for a deep correction in the crypto market. For context, a sale of $200 million was enough to trigger a 2.5% decline. At the moment, the company still holds about $53 billion worth of Bitcoin on its balance sheet.
- Oct 6, 20264.4x their median
Saylor predicts a crypto market reversal Michael Saylor, whose fund Strategy now holds 4% of all Bitcoin in existence, called the next 10 years a “gold rush” for BTC and said the bear market is over. He’s also back to buying: a few days ago, Strategy bought another $143 million worth of BTC. What’s interesting: Saylor believes the next major growth driver will be traditional banks. They’ll start issuing loans backed by BTC, just like they currently lend against real estate or stocks. In his view, this could be the biggest factor driving the price over the next three years. Essentially, this process is already underway. The crypto lending market has grown to $67 billion, and major U.S. banks have already started offering Bitcoin-backed loans. The market itself is also starting to pick up. BTC is up 40% this quarter alone, while Bitcoin ETFs saw another $2.4 billion in inflows last week.
- Aug 1, 20263.7x their median
Take on too much risk — and lose Here's a story from the world of finance that the entire market is talking about right now. Two years ago, 22-year-old wunderkind and former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner (pictured) launched his first investment fund. Some very big names believed in him and invested around $400 million. And that's despite the fact that he'd never managed money before. So what did Leopold do? He went all in on a single scenario: that the development of AI would create enormous demand for chips, memory, electricity, and data centers. And that bet paid off. Big time: by 2026, the fund had grown to around $30 billion, with an unbelievable return of over 700%. “A new genius has been born on Wall Street.” That's what everyone was saying. But then July 2026 came. Stocks of AI-related companies suddenly started falling. The fund's key holdings dropped 35% or more during July alone. How much the fund lost overall is still unknown. At the same time, half of its remaining assets consist of a stake in the private company Anthropic, which can't simply be sold quickly. And the fund could have survived this. But it wasn't investing only its investors' money — it had also borrowed enormous sums from banks. For every dollar of its own capital, it had up to four borrowed dollars. Now the banks are demanding their money back, and the fund is being forced to sell its assets right into the downturn. According to CNBC, the fund is closing out its entire public portfolio. In other words, it's selling all of its publicly traded stocks under pressure from its brokers. Tough luck for the guy. But for the rest of us, it's another lesson in how you can achieve enormous success, even correctly identify the biggest trend of the decade, and still lose if you take on too much risk and lose control of the situation.
- Jun 20, 20263.6x their median
Bitcoin vs China 🇹🇼 Taiwan has accumulated $602 billion in foreign exchange reserves. But there's one serious problem: 80% of that amount is held in U.S. dollars. That's why the country is now officially discussing the idea of converting part of those reserves into Bitcoin. The reason: Taiwan effectively does not control its money. And it's unclear what could happen to those assets if China ultimately attacks the island and Taiwan faces a major crisis. 🔐 A new philosophy of reserves In the past, countries held their reserves in gold and U.S. dollars. But after several nations discovered that their money could be frozen at a critical moment, attitudes toward reserve assets began to change. And Bitcoin is different: it isn't held in another country's bank, it doesn't need to be physically transported, and it can't be blocked by a single political decision.
- Aug 31, 20263.2x their median
Why are billionaires buying plumbers? Who would have thought, but the biggest investment funds have found a new favorite asset. They are rushing to buy plumbing, electrical, and air-conditioning service companies on a massive scale. For context: since 2022 alone, funds have bought almost 800 such companies in the US. The most striking case is Apex Service Partners. In 2019, Alpine started bringing small trade service companies together under this company. Back then, Apex’s revenue was around $40 million. Today, it is already more than $3 billion, while the entire company was recently valued at around $10 billion. Why does this work? The US home services market is worth around $700 billion, but it is still made up of thousands of small firms. Funds buy them one by one, consolidate advertising, procurement, and management – and build one large network. And demand is very strong: pipes and air conditioners still need to be fixed, homes in the US are getting older, while the number of skilled tradespeople is declining. That is why, following the same model, companies providing elevator, fire-system, roofing, and even garage-door services are already being bought up. Essentially, funds have found a way to turn a very ordinary local business into companies worth billions of dollars. Most likely, the US has once again launched a new business model. And this proven model will quickly start being copied in other countries, building similarly large networks out of local service businesses.
- Jul 29, 20263.2x their median
How do you @British_Airways even operate as an airline? I’ve never experienced a 2-hour delay on a flight that’s only 1.5 hours long. This is an absolute joke. You should take a tour of Emirates’ headquarters. Maybe they can show you how a proper airline is run.
- Jul 25, 20262.9x their median
How social media is being banned around the world Just a couple of years ago, only one country wanted to ban social media for children. Now it's 25. Australia has banned social media for anyone under 16. The UK is introducing its ban starting in 2027, with France, Spain, and Turkey following. The justification is the same everywhere: protecting children. It's also a message that tends to resonate with the public, making these laws much easier to pass. Infinite scroll, autoplay, push notifications — all of these are now increasingly being treated as addictive design features. In other words, social media is starting to be regulated much like cigarettes or gambling. The problem is, bans by themselves don't actually work. The only way to reliably keep kids off these platforms is to verify everyone's age — using government ID, banking information, or biometrics. In other words, if governments want to keep teenagers off apps like TikTok, they also have to eliminate anonymity for adults. That's exactly what many of these countries are now discussing. The UK has already started putting this into practice. So the global trend looks like this: phase out online anonymity under the banner of protecting children. Want to use the internet? Be prepared to submit your personal information and verify your identity.
- Aug 27, 20262.7x their median
Has the crypto market’s bull run begun? 👀 Bitcoin has soared from around $63,000 to above $80,000 in just a couple of weeks. And for the first time in a long while, this move doesn’t look like just another bounce. I already wrote about the main catalyst behind this rally a few days ago. It all comes down to the U.S., which has started buying back its own bonds on a large scale. But now, new details have emerged. The U.S. is also considering using part of its reserve — where nearly $1 trillion currently sits — for these buybacks. In terms of the impact on the markets, this could look somewhat similar to 2021: there will be more money in the system, bond yields will move lower, and stocks and crypto will get even more fuel for further growth. So the market’s fate depends on this. But it’s still too early to celebrate the start of a new bull run. BTC has hit resistance around $81,000 — several key levels converge there at once. If the market manages to establish itself above that level, the next area of interest could very well be $95,000–$100,000. But if it fails to break through and the inflow of big money starts to fade, the current +30% could turn out to be just a very strong bounce followed by a natural correction. But for the first time in a long while, Bitcoin’s growth is being driven not only by expectations, but by real money and macroeconomic factors.
- Aug 20, 20262.7x their median
If you’re in AI, pivot to crypto.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.086% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 113 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
- What is Alex Falcon's engagement rate on X?
- Alex Falcon (@iamalexfalcon) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,365,199 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Alex Falcon sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @iamalexfalcon have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @iamalexfalcon post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.