交易天才ZXY engagement report
@gunnazxy - 463K followers on X
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 463K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.135% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75 interactions, about 3.1x its own typical post.
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
交易天才ZXY's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, 交易天才ZXY sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.435% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 73K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 80K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 88K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 96K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 99K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 103K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 92K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 86K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 81K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 75K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 67K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 234K |
| Monday | 0% | 294K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 288K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 253K |
| Thursday | -2% | 247K |
| Friday | -3% | 256K |
| Saturday | +3% | 230K |
Best tweets
- Aug 5, 20263.1x their median
$WOOF 的故事远不止于短期的价格走势图。其真正的实力源于幕后构建的坚实基础：不断壮大的社区、鲜明的品牌形象、持续的内容产出，以及着眼于长期增长的愿景。 在众多项目竞相追逐短期热度的当下，WOOF 选择了不同的路径：致力于培育文化、鼓励社区参与，并打造一个能与用户建立情感共鸣的品牌。 强大的社区往往是成功生态系统的核心驱动力。当持有者认同项目使命、积极参与其中并传播其愿景时，项目便能积聚起超越市场周期的强劲势头。 未来的成就在于执行，但早期的关注往往属于那些在热潮来临前便已默默耕耘的项目。 $WOOF 正在为此夯实基础。 CA: 0xe15db7C8547A0adD11eB26A700246cCa08aEfCe5
- Aug 7, 20263.1x their median
经历近期的回调后， $WIWIWI 依然展现出健康的市场结构，尽管面临短期抛压，却持续受到广泛关注。 3XEe11RMNqNTka33ik2yEmr3siUWmFQWSESP9Ejepump 在经历一轮快速上涨后，价格已进入盘整阶段；在此期间，早期持仓正在进行换手，而新资金也正逐步寻找战略性的入场时机。📈 https://t.co/E7uK31JlU9 从市场角度来看，当前的走势更像是筹码沉淀与获利回吐的消化期，而非趋势的终结。 只要交易活跃度保持强劲且市场关注度持续提升，$WIWIWI 仍有望重新测试关键阻力位，并为下一轮上涨行情夯实基础。 对于那些持续保持高社区参与度和市场活跃度的项目而言，盘整往往是增长周期中的自然一环。未来的关键在于，是否有新的流动性和买盘动能重返市场。 许多交易者正密切关注这一盘整阶段是否会成为下一轮扩张行情的铺垫。若市场情绪好转且买方重掌主导权，$WIWIWI 或将迎来新一轮的突破契机。
- Aug 18, 20262.7x their median
zj1jpp7QMveWHLs61vL9KMZf254KvW7j4AAmBF8ry2k $BULLSHIT 不仅仅是在蹭“Black Bull”（黑牛）的热度，它更是在试图捕捉一个已因 Ansem 的关注而热度飙升的叙事。@BULLSHIT_ANSEM 数周以来，“Black Bull”已从单纯的视觉形象演变为看涨市场文化的标志性符号，并经由 Ansem 的发帖、内容创作及社区活动不断强化。如今，这一叙事已具备了超越单一图像本身的强大势能。 这为 BULLSHIT 创造了一个有趣的切入点：借势既有的 Meme 语境，触达那些已理解该梗含义的受众，并将现有的关注度转化为新一轮的投机热潮。 在 Meme 币领域，叙事的传播速度往往快于基本面的变化。 而当叙事热度正盛之时，下一个问题便显而易见： 谁将接棒吸引大众目光？👀 BULLSHIT 或许正是为此蓄势待发。
- Aug 27, 20262.4x their median
市场正开始关注 $GWOOD 最引人注目的是其背后叙事日益增强的势头。随着关注度的提升和社区的持续推动，对于那些密切关注其下一轮潜在走势的人来说，当前的局面显得愈发值得期待。 图表呈现了一个简单的信号：买盘正在涌现，市场情绪在升温，看涨叙事也获得了越来越多的认可。 尽管前路尚长，但这恰恰是当前阶段值得关注的原因所在。 GWOOD 已吸引了市场目光。@GwoodFinance 社区充满活力。 接下来，市场将决定它能走多远。 看好这一走势。
- Aug 8, 20262.2x their median
长盛不衰的 Meme 往往由社群构建 @NeegyOfficial 最具生命力的 Meme 很少仅仅依赖于短暂的关注热潮。真正持久的 Meme，往往依托于那些在最初的热度消退后，依然能够共同建设、持续创作并不断成长的社群。 这正是 $NEEGY 值得关注的原因。 随着越来越多的人发现该项目，其影响力正在社交领域不断扩大。社群讨论日益活跃，由成员自发创作的内容势头强劲，围绕该品牌的独特形象也已初具雏形。 CA: 6oGuFDbEeaSzTcvrmmd2MqfNYwHKXFoN7regcR22pump 对于一个网络迷因项目而言，这种自发的参与可能比短暂的关注更有意义。强大的社群赋予了 Meme 进化的能力，使其能够孕育独特的文化，并在市场周期的更迭中始终保持活力与相关性。 NEEGY 的故事仍在书写之中，但其社群已然赋予了这一故事鲜明的特质。 下一阶段的目标，将在于将日益增长的关注度转化为持久的社群参与。
- Aug 13, 20262.1x their median
Swappy 的吉祥物形象日益鲜明，其代币经济模型也变得同样引人入胜。 创作者费用流入回购和销毁机制，构成了一个简单的故事：供应减少，稀缺性增强，社区参与度更高。 这种机制赋予 $SWAPPY 的不仅仅是一个令人印象深刻的吉祥物，更赋予了项目一个可以随着生态系统发展而不断演进的故事。 社区持续前进。 每一步都为更宏大的图景添砖加瓦。 下一个篇章或许更加精彩。 供应减少。 稀缺性增强。 更多 Swappy。@swappyonx $SWAPPY 持续建设。持续销毁。持续交换。 0x298348d5b2e45C774E3ee4f1a0924071DfbDC8C7
- Aug 17, 20262.1x their median
$CHIIKAWA 的旅程才刚刚起步，但其长期的全球潜力已不容小觑。 https://t.co/B2xOEKBdBJ 备受喜爱的 Chiikawa IP 已经积累了庞大的粉丝群，但在国际市场上的拓展空间依然广阔。随着知名度在更多新市场不断提升，该品牌有望吸引更广泛的受众，并建立更具影响力的全球形象。@Chiikawa_on_s 这一生态系统最引人注目之处在于，其影响力早已超越了屏幕本身。周边商品、收藏品、粉丝社群以及各类文化内容共同构建了一个具备持久认知度与深厚情感联结的生态体系。 依托强大 IP 和热情社群构建的项目，往往难以一蹴而就地实现其全部潜力；这需要时间、持之以恒的努力以及不断的拓展。 2c1KjiyQow66QfsnCtoyuqfo3AuxgpBMEoAq5oiiXqdu 尽管 $CHIIKAWA 的旅程尚处于起步阶段，但它已为书写更宏大的全球篇章奠定了坚实基础。
- Jul 30, 20262.0x their median
市值并非总能反映全貌。 有时，估值较低的项目反而会在幕后构建真正的基石。 $CATE 的独特之处在于，它专注于透明度、社区价值以及可衡量的影响力，这得益于其与一家官方慈善机构的合作，该机构拥有公开记录和明确的承诺。 虽然一些规模较大的项目已经取得了显著的市场里程碑，但关于费用分配和捐款处理方式的问题仍然悬而未决。在信任至关重要的领域，透明度成为衡量长期潜力的最有力指标之一。 Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump $CATE 代表了一种不同的方式，即通过实际行动而非投机来建立信誉。一个项目的价值不仅仅体现在其价格走势或市值上，更体现在其创造的目标、构建的社区以及超越市场的价值上。 下一代成功的项目将是那些将强大的社区与实际影响力相结合的项目。
- Aug 23, 20261.6x their median
随着区块链生态系统内的活动开始回暖，Base 似乎正让其平台上的一些早期 Meme 币重新受到关注。 @PlumberOnBase 0xb20000000000000000000029440A9564B59129B1 $PLUMBER 便是吸引此类关注的项目之一。 然而，更重要的问题不仅仅在于 PLUMBER 发生了什么，而在于 Base 是否正步入由 Meme 驱动的活跃期新阶段。 如果流动性持续涌入该生态系统，那些拥有一定历史积淀和既定叙事的早期代币，自然可能成为新一轮投机炒作的对象。 PLUMBER 还有一个额外优势：其 Meme 概念已获得 Base 及 Coinbase 相关账号以及更广泛的 Coinbase 社区成员的关注，这使得该叙事相比那些完全默默无闻的新项目，拥有更强大的传播网络。 与“PLUNGER”（疏通器）概念的关联也为该项目的故事增添了新的维度。一旦某个 Meme 获得认可，社区便能不断对其进行重新解读，并将其延展为全新的叙事。
- Aug 10, 20261.5x their median
$TOAD 是那种值得停下来仔细观察的 Meme 案例。 @eltoadpepe A13oRB9FFaiUjfi6LdCg6p9ka1u8SfGkUFs4SKvPpump 市场上并不缺少靠早期买入获得巨大回报的钱包，但真正值得关注的，往往不是收益数字本身，而是这些钱包在获利之后做了什么。 但更有意思的是，他并没有在价格上涨后离场。 相反，他依然保持活跃，持续参与社区讨论、推动项目曝光，并通过内容和行动为生态贡献力量。 这其实反映出了 Meme 项目中一个很重要的变量： 持有者究竟只是投资者，还是正在成为项目的一部分？ 对于纯粹依赖短期情绪的 Meme 来说，早期买家往往更关心退出流动性。 而当持有者开始主动传播、创作内容、吸引新用户，甚至参与项目建设时，市场结构可能会发生变化——持仓不再只是一个数字，也开始变成社区参与度的一部分。 当然，一个钱包的行为本身并不能证明 TOAD 的长期价值。 但如果越来越多的持有者表现出类似的行为，那么这种自发参与就值得持续观察。 价格可以制造注意力。 真正决定一个 Meme 能走多远的，往往是注意力消退之后，还有多少人愿意留下来继续建设。 这也是我认为 TOAD 值得继续关注的地方。
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 463K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.135% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75 interactions, about 3.1x its own typical post.
- What is 交易天才ZXY's engagement rate on X?
- 交易天才ZXY (@gunnazxy) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 462,917 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, 交易天才ZXY sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @gunnazxy have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @gunnazxy post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.