Back to @alfreyes14's profile

Alfonso Reyes engagement report

@alfreyes14 - 97K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.266%
of 97K followers
Per impression
1.58%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
16.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
258
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 258 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.266%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 3,848 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #stopzocatofobia.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alfonso Reyes's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,848 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.266%, Alfonso Reyes sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.436%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,214 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,785 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 202624x their median

    Por favor: decidme con honestidad qué os parece que los grupos lleguen así a un casco histórico Patrimonio Mundial. Suben el vídeo a sus propias redes. https://t.co/9HEr0JvLDn

    2.8K3622.4K7053.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202621x their median

    Veo que muchos no saben que tengo una librería. Comparto fotos de cómo nació. Está en Buñol, era un horno abandonado y también tenemos web: https://t.co/IjjquW225P https://t.co/CFN1p45bTH

    4.3K80915235285K viewsView on X
  • Feb 14, 202611x their median

    George Harrison wanted to show that all religions are essentially praising the same "Lord." 🎵 "My Sweet Lord" 🎵 https://t.co/V9F9EfpNt0

    2.2K475362450K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.8x their median

    ¿Soy el único que echa mucho de menos a "El círculo de lectores"?

    990441802058K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.9x their median

    Algún día habría que hablar del pésimo servicio, en general, de las compañías aéreas. Por no hablar del espacio para las piernas y la comodidad. Y no sólo para gente de 2 metros. Vamos a peor en muchísimas cosas. Cualquier tiempo pasado fue mucho mejor en cantidad de ellas.

    8747752214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.6x their median

    García Lorca, Muñoz-Seca, y tantos miles. Muertes terribles de una guerra entre hermanos.

    8197824418K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20263.1x their median

    Cita ineludible en La Cala del Moral (el limón es para limpiarse las manos, aclaración para tocapelotillas). https://t.co/eYskuuKg7u

    6942471018K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.7x their median

    Top 10 novelas de la historia de la literatura. Me ha costado mucho llegar a una versión definitiva de esta lista, y aun así, no me quedo del todo tranquilo... Hacer un top 10 de las mejores novelas de la historia conlleva cometer injusticias. Diez puestos son poquísimos y sé bien que las ausencias duelen. Se quedan fuera novelas que podrían entrar perfectamente en cualquier lista de este tipo: el «Ulises» de Joyce, «La montaña mágica» de Mann (volvería a dudar entre «Los Buddenbrook» o «La montaña...», de hecho), «El proceso» de Kafka, «Al faro» de Virginia Woolf, «Cumbres borrascosas» de Emily Brontë o «¡Absalón, Absalón!» o «El ruido y la furia» de Faulkner, entre muchas otras. También soy consciente de que colocar tres novelas españolas en los tres primeros puestos puede resultar sorprendete a algunos. Pero no quería construir una lista atendiendo a cuotas ni buscando que todos los grandes cánones estuvieran representados. Considero que «La Regenta» y «Fortunata y Jacinta» son, junto con el Quijote, las mayores novelas que se han escrito. Tenían que estar ahí. Y después está el orden, quizá incluso más discutible que las propias elecciones... Así que no entiendo esta lista como algo cerrado ni definitivo, sino como un intento —imposible— de llevar siglos de historia de narrativa a diez títulos. Ahora os toca sufrir a vosotros: ¿qué novela quitaríais y cuál pondríais en su lugar?

    3734099186681K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.9x their median

    La mejor saga familiar de la historia de la literatura: https://t.co/nz5J1MNqEs

    4362517655K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.7x their median

    las llamáis olivas o aceitunas?😭 https://t.co/OuSnWMWCx2

    9842934654K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#stopzocatofobia

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 258 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.266%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 3,848 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is Alfonso Reyes's engagement rate on X?
Alfonso Reyes (@alfreyes14) has an engagement rate of 0.266%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 97,062 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.266%, Alfonso Reyes sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @alfreyes14 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,848 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @alfreyes14 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going