Back to @Safety's profile

Safety engagement report

@Safety - 3.2M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.342%
of 3.2M followers
Per impression
0.185%
5.9M views on a typical post
Reach
185.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
11K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.086%
5.0K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 11K interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.342%. Posts are seen about 5.9M times each, and 0.185% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 185.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 103K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.342%, Safety sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Oct 16, 202415x their median

    Soon we’ll be launching a change to how the block function works. If your posts are set to public, accounts you have blocked will be able to view them, but they will not be able to engage (like, reply, repost, etc.).

    17K3.0K20K64K90M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20241.8x their median

    Ken Klippenstein was temporarily suspended for violating our rules on posting unredacted private personal information, specifically Sen. Vance’s physical addresses and the majority of his Social Security number.

    16K1.5K1.2K3991.8M viewsView on X
  • Jan 10, 2025

    We’re rolling out profile labels for parody accounts to clearly distinguish these types of accounts and their content on our platform. We designed these labels to increase transparency and to ensure that users are not deceived into thinking such accounts belong to the entity being parodied. Parody labels will be applied to both posts and accounts on X to clearly demonstrate the source of the content you’re seeing. We’ll share details soon on when the label will become mandatory for parody accounts. These accounts, like all accounts on X, must still adhere to the X Rules - particularly our Authenticity policy: https://t.co/I9vOTG0qPW. If you believe an account is inauthentic or impersonating an entity, you can report the account in-app or via our Help Center.

    9.9K1.8K1.5K1.1K14M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    https://t.co/soxNY8YdP7

    7.5K1.2K6901.3K5.9M viewsView on X
  • Jan 14, 2026

    https://t.co/awlfMjX6FS

    4.7K8106028898.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 2025

    Introducing AI Note Writer API 🤖 AI helping humans. Humans still in charge. Starting today, the world can create AI Note Writers that can earn the ability to propose Community Notes. Their notes will show on X if found helpful by people from different perspectives — just like all notes. Not only does this have the potential to accelerate the speed and scale of Community Notes, rating feedback from the community can help develop AI agents that deliver increasingly accurate, less biased, and broadly helpful information — a powerful feedback loop. The program kicks off today with a pilot and will expand over time. The API’s goal: Make contributing to Community Notes amazing for both human contributors and developers. Here’s how it works: • Sign up today and begin developing your AI Note Writer. • Start writing notes in test mode. • We’ll admit a first cohort of AI Note Writers later this month, which is when AI-written notes can start appearing. Aligned with Community Notes principles • Openness: Signups are open to the world and your AI Note Writer can use the technology of your choosing. • Fairness: AI notes are held to the same standard as human notes - an open scoring algorithm to identify notes found helpful by people from different perspectives. • Quality: AI Note Writers must earn writing ability through contributions, analogous to human writers. • Transparency: AI notes will be clearly marked for users. Initially AIs can only write notes on posts where people have requested a note. We expect this to grow over time. Learn more and sign up: https://t.co/cRW4QJb2Gu

    4.3K9967981423.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 2025

    By November 10, we’re asking all accounts that use a security key as their two factor authentication (2FA) method to re-enroll their key to continue accessing X. You can re-enroll your existing security key, or enroll a new one. A reminder: if you enroll a new security key, any other security keys will stop working (unless also re-enrolled).

    3.7K1.3K5144273.5M viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 2025

    At X, we have zero tolerance for child sexual exploitation in any form. Until recently, we leveraged partnerships that helped us along the way. We are proud to provide an important update on our continuous work detecting Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) content, announcing today that we have launched additional CSAM hash matching efforts. This system allows X to hash and match media content quickly and securely, keeping the platform safer without sacrificing user privacy. This is enabled by the incredible work of our safety engineering team, who have built state of the art systems to further strengthen our enforcement capabilities. When we identify apparent CSAM, we act swiftly to suspend the account and report the content to @NCMEC, which works with law enforcement globally to pursue justice and protect children. In 2024, X sent 686,176 reports to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) and suspended 4,572,486 accounts. Between July and October 2024, @NCMEC received 94 arrests and 1 conviction thanks to this partnership. Over the years, we’ve invested in advanced technology and tools to stop bad actors from distributing, searching for, or engaging with exploitative content across all media formats on X. We are proud to continue leading the industry in this arena and will never stop using the full extent of our capabilities to eliminate these harmful practices.

    4.1K506403160317K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 2025

    Community Notes show when they’re found helpful by people who normally disagree. What if we could do the same for posts, recognizing posts that are liked by people who normally disagree? We’ve heard requests for this for years since launching Community Notes, and we’re starting a small, experimental pilot to test the concept. Starting today, a subset of Community Notes contributors — representing a wide range of viewpoints — will occasionally see a new callout in the product. The callout shows based on early and limited Like signals on the post. Contributors can then rate and provide feedback about the post, helping to develop an open source algorithm that could effectively identify posts liked by people from different perspectives. People often feel the world is divided, yet Community Notes shows people can agree, even on contentious topics. This experimental new feature seeks to uncover ideas, insights, and opinions that bridge perspectives. It can bring awareness to what resonates broadly. It could motivate people to share those ideas in the first place. Ultimately, it could help move the world forward in ways that the people want. Following the path we used to develop Community Notes, we’re building in public with a small pilot so that this concept can be shaped by the people. We look forward to learning and iterating with you all as we do with Community Notes every day. Learn more at https://t.co/PvWa3neupo

    3.9K551324762.9M viewsView on X
  • Dec 5, 2024

    We've expanded the eligibility criteria for grey checkmarks. Here's what you need to know: – Global expansion for governors: Previously limited to US governors, we're now opening applications for governors worldwide. – Broader government agency inclusion: State and local government agencies, which were previously subject to limited eligibility, will now see an expansion in line with the criteria set for federal agencies. – New eligible government figures: We're welcoming First Ladies/Gentlemen, Second Ladies/Gentlemen, Consorts, Governors/Chief Ministers, Deputies of Cabinet Members/Ministers, and Ambassadors to the fold. To learn more about eligibility requirements and how to apply, visit our Help Center: https://t.co/OCgW35Hd4z

    3.9K530411571.7M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 11K interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.342%. Posts are seen about 5.9M times each, and 0.185% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 185.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 103K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Safety's engagement rate on X?
Safety (@Safety) has an engagement rate of 0.342%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,156,507 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.342%, Safety sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Safety have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Safety post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going