Back to @Garrel_Channel's profile

เผบโœฆ๐Ÿ๐†๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐Ÿโœฆเผป engagement report

@Garrel_Channel - 93K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.152%
of 93K followers
Per impression
4.75%
3.0K views on a typical post
Reach
3.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
141
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 141 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.152%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 4.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 127x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #endfield, #ใฟใ‚ƒใƒผใพใƒผใจ, #ใ‚ขใƒผใ‚ฏใƒŠใ‚คใƒ„.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #endfield, #ใฟใ‚ƒใƒผใพใƒผใจ, #ใ‚ขใƒผใ‚ฏใƒŠใ‚คใƒ„.

Compared with accounts its own size

เผบโœฆ๐Ÿ๐†๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐Ÿโœฆเผป's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.152%, เผบโœฆ๐Ÿ๐†๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐Ÿโœฆเผป sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jan 7, 2023127x their median

    ใ€็ท้›†็ทจ~Summary~ใ€‘ #ๅ†™็œŸ #photography https://t.co/fgyIhuDXDD

    14K3.2K34530883K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    ็ˆ็ฒใŒๆ‚ชใฟใŸใ„ใชๆ€่€ƒๅ›ž่ทฏใ‚’ๅบƒใ‚ใ‚‹ใชใ€‚

    1665803.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    ๆ˜จๆ—ฅใฎๅคœไธญใซ็›ฎ็œฉใŒใ—ใฆใ€ใใฎๆ‹ๅญใซ้ก”ใ‚’็ฉบๆฐ—ๆธ…ๆต„ๆฉŸใซ็ชใฃ่พผใ‚“ใงใ—ใพใฃใฆใ€ๅซใถ็จ‹ใซ่ก€ใŒๆญขใพใ‚‰ใชใ„็Šถๆณใชใฎใซใ€็—›ใฟๆญขใ‚ใ‚’ๆŒใฃใฆๆฃ’็ซ‹ใกใ—ใฆใ‚‹้ฆฌ้นฟใจใ€่ตทใ“ใ™ใชใฃใฆ้ก”ใ—ใฆใ‚‹ๅฅดใŒใ„ใฆใ€ใ‚ใใ€ๆœฌๅฝ“ใซใ€Œไป–่€…ใฏไป–่€…ใ€ใŒๅŸบๆœฌใฎไธ–็•Œใชใฎใ‹ใ€ใฃใฆ็†่งฃใ—ใŸใ€‚

    1712203.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    ใŠๆ‰‹่ปฝใƒ‡ใƒˆใƒƒใ‚ฏใ‚น ใƒŸใƒณใƒˆ+ใ‚ซใƒขใƒŸใƒผใƒซ+ใƒญใƒผใ‚บใƒ’ใƒƒใƒ— ไป•ไธŠใ’ใซ็ˆ็ฒใ‚’ๆทนใ‚Œใ‚‹ ๅ‘ณใฏ้…ทใ„ใŒๅŠนๆžœใฏใŠๅขจไป˜ใ

    1582302.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    ไฝ•ๆ™‚ใ‚‚ๆ€ใฃใฆใ‚‹ใ‚“ใ ใ‘ใฉใ€ใ‚ซใƒฉใ‚ชใ‚ฑ่กŒใฃใŸๆ™‚ใซใ‚นใƒžใƒผใƒˆใƒ•ใ‚ฉใƒณใฎ็”ป้ขใ‚’่ฆ‹ใฆใ‚‹ใฎใŒๅคฑ็คผใฃใฆ่ฉฑใ‚’ใ™ใ‚‹ๅฅดใฃใฆใ€ๆœฌๅฝ“ใซใฉใ†ใ—ใ‚ˆใ†ใ‚‚ใชใ„ๅฅดใ ใ‚ˆใชใ€‚่‡ชๅˆ†ใฏใ—ใชใ„ๆง˜ใซๆ„่ญ˜ใ—ใฆใ‚‹ใ‘ใฉใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใŒใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹ๅˆ†ใซใฏใฉใ†ใงใ‚‚่‰ฏ้ŽใŽใ‚‹ใ€‚

    1424303.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    ใƒใƒ†ใƒˆ้ฃŸในๆ”พ้กŒใฎใ‚ซใƒฉใ‚ชใ‚ฑๅบ—ใงใƒ’ใƒˆใ‚ซใƒฉใ—ใฆใ‚‹ๆ™‚ใฃใฆๅ…จ่ƒฝๆ„Ÿใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚

    1423103.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    ็›ธๆ‰‹ใฎ่ฉฑใ‚’่žใ‹ใชใ„โ‡จร— ็›ธๆ‰‹ใฎ่ฉฑใ‚’็†่งฃใ—ใชใ„โ‡จร— ็›ธๆ‰‹ใฎ่ฉฑใ‚’็†่งฃๅ‡บๆฅใชใ„โ‡จโ—‹ ่ชญๆ›ธใ—ใชใ„ๅผŠๅฎณใฃใฆไบ‹ใ‹ใชโ€ฆ๏ผŸ

    1312303.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    ไธ–่ซ–ใซๆตใ•ใ‚Œใฆ่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎใ€Œๅฅฝใใ€ใชๆœฌ่ณชใ‚’่ฆ‹ๅคฑใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใจใ€ๅฐ†ๆฅใซ้–ขใ—ใฆใฏๅนธใ›ใ‹ใ‚‚็Ÿฅใ‚Œใชใ„ใŒใ€ๅพŒใ‹ใ‚‰ๅพŒๆ‚”ใ™ใ‚‹ไบ‹ใซใชใ‚‹ใฎใงใ€ๅฅฝใใชไบ‹ใซ้–ขใ—ใฆใฏๅฆฅๅ”ใ—ใชใ„ๆ–นใŒ่‰ฏใ„ใ€‚

    1112202.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    ใ“ใฃใกใŒๆญข่ก€็”จใฎๅŒ…ๅธฏๅ…จๅŠ›ใงๆŽขใ—ใฆใ‚‹ใฎใซใใ‚Œใฃใฝใ„้ก”ใง็—›ใฟๆญขใ‚ๆŒใกๅ‡บใ™ใฎ่พžใ‚ใ‚ๆฎบๆ„ๆนงใ„ใฆๆฅใ‚‹ใ€‚

    1073102.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    ใ ใ‹ใ‚‰AIๅซŒใ„ใŒAIใƒ„ใƒผใƒซใ‚’ไฝฟใ†ใชใฃใคใฃใฆใ‚“ใฎใ€‚

    952203.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#endfield#ใฟใ‚ƒใƒผใพใƒผใจ#ใ‚ขใƒผใ‚ฏใƒŠใ‚คใƒ„#ใ‚จใƒณใƒ‰ใƒ•ใ‚ฃใƒผใƒซใƒ‰#ใƒ€ใƒณใ‚ฌใƒณใƒญใƒณใƒ‘

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 141 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.152%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 4.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 127x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #endfield, #ใฟใ‚ƒใƒผใพใƒผใจ, #ใ‚ขใƒผใ‚ฏใƒŠใ‚คใƒ„.

What is เผบโœฆ๐Ÿ๐†๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐Ÿโœฆเผป's engagement rate on X?
เผบโœฆ๐Ÿ๐†๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐Ÿโœฆเผป (@Garrel_Channel) has an engagement rate of 0.152%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,896 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.152%, เผบโœฆ๐Ÿ๐†๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐Ÿโœฆเผป sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Garrel_Channel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Garrel_Channel post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going