Back to @BWWings's profile

Buffalo Wild Wings engagement report

@BWWings - 586K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.022%
of 586K followers
Per impression
0.627%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
3.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
126
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 586K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.627% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 552x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #momota.

Compared with accounts its own size

Buffalo Wild Wings's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.022%, Buffalo Wild Wings sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 14, 2026552x their median

    I painted a happy ending to the bison story https://t.co/IKhhhZVZo8

    65K4.0K331157920K viewsView on X
  • Jan 6, 2026329x their median

    Low-frequency electromagnetic fields can degrade collagen, weaken tendons, and cause soft-tissue damage at levels regulators call "safe." We have a real world case study proving this: An NFL team whose practice facility sits next to a massive electrical substation. THREAD 🧵 https://t.co/4AFRlmqgZv

    34K4.2K1.2K1.6K22M viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 2026273x their median

    Seattle has recently sighted a Raccoon that frequents the local parks with Short Spine Syndrome (SSS). The locals have endearingly nicknamed him, "Jimothy". https://t.co/6ScPfrcNn3

    31K2.2K5588383.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026193x their median

    I’ve been laughing at this video all morning https://t.co/zI1D5dhi83

    23K1.0K1421491.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026171x their median

    Yikes: The Bills' new $2.1 billion stadium has gone viral for being the "WORST" designed stadium of all time. Almost every section in the upper deck of the new Highmark Stadium has obstructed views due to clear design flaws. 😬😬😬 https://t.co/DN3VH2q0F7

    19K1.1K8032703.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202683x their median

    here's a refresher of what MLB's Aug 3rd 6:00 pm ET trade deadline means https://t.co/q51zr54jPF

    10K2343116258K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202636x their median

    Can someone let "Big Al" Alfred Delia know that if he shows up to the Williamsport Buffalo Wild Wings this week, tab is on us (Then/Now). Legends never die. https://t.co/9M6IsxzZlZ

    4.5K81113961K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202622x their median

    FOOTBALL.....IS......BACK.....BABY!!!!

    2.4K330331947K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202611x their median

    THEY’RE BACK👀🎉Your favorite classic B-Dubs menu items are making their return TOMORROW, 8/19. https://t.co/a0uyF2pjHn

    1.2K558552321K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.9x their median

    Heartwarming: Justin Herbert and Madison Beer spotted together on the field at Chargers practice. Justin has completely changed since meeting Beer. True love is so special 🥹❤️ https://t.co/EczHYwDS6A

    203630572K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#momota

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 586K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.627% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 552x its own typical post.

What is Buffalo Wild Wings's engagement rate on X?
Buffalo Wild Wings (@BWWings) has an engagement rate of 0.022%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 585,535 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.022%, Buffalo Wild Wings sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BWWings have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BWWings post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going