PlayerSells
Back to @rubyjanelovly's profile

π’π’‚π’Šπ’” ღ engagement report

@rubyjanelovly - 999 followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2178.9%
of 999 followers
Per impression
15.7%
138K views on a typical post
Reach
13863.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
22K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.185%
256 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.6/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 22K interactions against 999 followers, an engagement rate of 2178.9%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 1,224 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 138K times each, and 15.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13863.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 299K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026. Recurring tag: #jisoo.

Compared with accounts its own size

π’π’‚π’Šπ’” ღ's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,224 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 1 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2178.9%, π’π’‚π’Šπ’” ღ sits above the 99th percentile of the 13,919 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 1% band, which runs 269.2% and above.

p100.001%
p250.008%
p50 (median)0.055%
p750.355%
p902.37%
p99269.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 13,919 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 269,226 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.008%
50th percentile0.055%
75th percentile0.355%
90th percentile2.37%
99th percentile269.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%18K
01:00 UTC+1%18K
02:00 UTC-1%18K
03:00 UTC-4%18K
04:00 UTC-7%15K
05:00 UTC-6%14K
06:00 UTC-6%16K
07:00 UTC-6%17K
08:00 UTC-6%20K
09:00 UTC-3%23K
10:00 UTC-2%25K
11:00 UTC-2%26K
12:00 UTC0%29K
13:00 UTC0%33K
14:00 UTC-2%34K
15:00 UTC-1%36K
16:00 UTC-1%35K
17:00 UTC-1%33K
18:00 UTC+1%30K
19:00 UTC+1%28K
20:00 UTC-1%26K
21:00 UTC+1%23K
22:00 UTC+1%20K
23:00 UTC0%18K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%85K
Monday+2%88K
Tuesday+1%102K
Wednesday-3%87K
Thursday-1%82K
Friday-4%89K
Saturday+4%83K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+83%+77% to +89%7.0K
Outbound link0% of posts-48%-50% to -47%7.2K
Typical length--5%-7% to -4%11K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 83% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 48% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 89 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 5% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 1, 202614x their median

    o conceito de sentir falta de uma amizade que vocΓͺ nΓ£o quer de volta https://t.co/OZdyTTdIGf

    231K63K4704.0K2.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202612x their median

    "o brasil foi eliminado porque vocΓͺ ainda tΓ‘ assistindo a copa" eu comemorando o cartΓ£o vermelho do enzo fernandez https://t.co/CiftfED3JJ

    223K46K2298771.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20266.7x their median

    morrendo https://t.co/zsjuKJBeQh

    119K26K69177779K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20263.7x their median

    Tenho hiperfoco em mandar figurinha dps de qualquer mensagem https://t.co/PFRLkKsQA7

    58K21K136522515K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20263.0x their median

    FOUREVER https://t.co/QJw5FZJdIz

    48K16K55417356K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20262.7x their median

    SerΓ‘ que eu nunca vou ver o Brasil ganhar uma copa

    44K15K220478433K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20262.6x their median

    - argentina perdeu - mbappe foi o artilheiro - tivemos uma partida divertida no 3° lugar - espanha ganhou e era uma seleção com apenas 1 estrela, indo pra 2 agr, ou seja, continuamos penta COPA HISTÓRICA, DOMINGO ABENÇOADO, O BEM VENCEU https://t.co/dr3MG7TDYU

    47K9.0K2657325K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20262.6x their median

    eu nao tenho uma lembranΓ§a da copa de 2018 parece q nunca aconteceu

    49K5.0K6041.7K1.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.6x their median

    as vezes eu esqueΓ§o que as pessoas podem ver minhas expressΓ΅es faciais https://t.co/MK42A7wypj

    42K13K80357305K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20262.4x their median

    tendo crise existencial aqui pensando em como minha vida vai estar diferente atΓ© a prΓ³xima copa https://t.co/o0gLr7PbpT

    42K10K135805384K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#jisoo

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 22K interactions against 999 followers, an engagement rate of 2178.9%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 1,224 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 138K times each, and 15.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13863.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 299K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is π’π’‚π’Šπ’” ღ's engagement rate on X?
π’π’‚π’Šπ’” ღ (@rubyjanelovly) has an engagement rate of 2178.9%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 999 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2178.9%, π’π’‚π’Šπ’” ღ sits above the 99th percentile of the 13,919 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @rubyjanelovly have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,224 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @rubyjanelovly post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going