PlayerSells
Back to @JoyVBehar's profile

Joy Behar engagement report

@JoyVBehar - 924K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.85%
of 924K followers
Per impression
6.13%
279K views on a typical post
Reach
30.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
17K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.049%
137 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 17K interactions against 924K followers, an engagement rate of 1.85%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 1,224 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 279K times each, and 6.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Joy Behar's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,224 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.85%, Joy Behar sits above the 75th percentile of the 12,602 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.351% to 2.43%.

p100.001%
p250.008%
p50 (median)0.053%
p750.351%
p902.43%
p99289.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 12,602 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 321,740 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.008%
50th percentile0.053%
75th percentile0.351%
90th percentile2.43%
99th percentile289.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%18K
01:00 UTC+1%18K
02:00 UTC-1%18K
03:00 UTC-4%18K
04:00 UTC-7%15K
05:00 UTC-6%14K
06:00 UTC-6%16K
07:00 UTC-6%17K
08:00 UTC-6%20K
09:00 UTC-3%23K
10:00 UTC-2%25K
11:00 UTC-2%26K
12:00 UTC0%29K
13:00 UTC0%33K
14:00 UTC-2%34K
15:00 UTC-1%36K
16:00 UTC-1%35K
17:00 UTC-1%33K
18:00 UTC+1%30K
19:00 UTC+1%28K
20:00 UTC-1%26K
21:00 UTC+1%23K
22:00 UTC+1%20K
23:00 UTC0%18K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%85K
Monday+2%88K
Tuesday+1%102K
Wednesday-3%87K
Thursday-1%82K
Friday-4%89K
Saturday+4%83K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+83%+77% to +89%7.0K
Outbound link9% of posts-48%-50% to -47%7.2K
Typical length--4%-6% to -3%9.4K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 83% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 48% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 227 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters run 4% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 20263.8x their median

    Hey guys, since you released faucis diary maybe now we can do the Epstein files?

    56K8.2K49997685K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20263.4x their median

    We are SEVERELY underreacting to what’s happening in our government.

    49K9.3K431260621K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20263.0x their median

    Tonight I heard a failed and desperate president who as war spirals and prices rise is as always focused on his grievances, his shame, and above all his fear of the accountability that will come with defeat. I also heard a president signaling his unmistakable intent to attack these elections and our voting rights, just as he tried to throw out our votes and seize the presidency in 2020. Our answer will be overwhelming. Across Georgia a wave of defiance is building to rebuke him so decisively that no president ever again dares such brazen corruption and abuse. The power of the presidency is nothing compared to the power of the people.

    40K7.1K3.8K256616K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 20262.7x their median

    There is a record-breaking heat wave in Europe and hundreds are dying. There is drought all across America and farmers are going out of business. Yet, Trump thinks climate change is a “hoax” and cuts funding for sustainable energy. Insane. He is threatening the very future of our planet.

    27K5.0K13K7071.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20261.9x their median

    Trump ousted all three members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, a bipartisan agency that works with state officials to ensure free and fair elections. Nice try, Mr. President. We won't let you sabotage the midterm elections. This is a democracy, not a dictatorship.

    23K5.5K4.6K237487K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20261.8x their median

    I’m not sure relitigating Covid is a great midterm election strategy, but I guess we will see! Remember: Trump was president during Covid

    26K3.6K1.4K116279K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 2026

    We are in the middle of a measles outbreak. A cyclospora outbreak. RFK is dismantling our public health system & scientific research. Millions have lost their health care. And Senate Republicans spent today attacking Dr. Fauci. https://t.co/nmGeQsQQej

    13K4.4K3.7K233161K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 2026

    Democrats - knock off the stupid ideological food fight. Find someone who can speak articulately about housing and gas costs, corruption, doesn't have a Nazi tattoo, and isn't over 80. It's not that hard.

    18K2.7K652104296K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 2026

    https://t.co/v7NphLeqjk

    15K4.7K3176664K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    There’s a part of Jon Ossoff’s Atlanta rally everyone missed, and it may have been the most powerful moment of the entire night. “I’ve got two little girls at home. Eva’s four and Lila’s one… But this isn’t the world I want to leave them.” Then he put America’s broken priorities into one devastating sentence: “We’ve amassed enough firepower to end the world a thousand times over, but we can’t summon the will to guarantee health care and pre-K.” And then came the line every parent will feel in their bones: “When Eva’s old enough to ask me why I let this happen, I’m determined to answer truthfully… THAT I DIDN’T.” 🔥🔥🔥 This is the entire damn fight.

    14K4.0K174102640K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 17K interactions against 924K followers, an engagement rate of 1.85%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 1,224 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 279K times each, and 6.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

What is Joy Behar's engagement rate on X?
Joy Behar (@JoyVBehar) has an engagement rate of 1.85%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 924,264 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.85%, Joy Behar sits above the 75th percentile of the 12,602 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JoyVBehar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,224 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JoyVBehar post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going