PlayerSells
Back to @littlebabe____'s profile

Baby🍓ONLY $4,80 engagement report

@littlebabe____ - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.198%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
4.57%
62K views on a typical post
Reach
4.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.98%
610 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.4/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 2.8K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.198%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 4.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 211K interactions, about 74x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Baby🍓ONLY $4,80's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.198%, Baby🍓ONLY $4,80 sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.046% to 0.318%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link19% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length-+7%+4% to +10%7.0K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 73 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 7% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 13, 202474x their median

    Wataa https://t.co/4vBXZr0Jt4

    188K23K32311512M viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 202670x their median

    I Love this gif so much https://t.co/B5qhWC2ut1

    172K26K2836403.7M viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 202665x their median

    #JJBA https://t.co/0GjTF6iPIt

    167K17K11841.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202654x their median

    When the last step of a recipe is “Enjoy” https://t.co/EOKd1kK5Si

    145K6.7K5511.1K14M viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202441x their median

    Want more backshots? Or nah? https://t.co/NqmLcKVWbJ

    105K12K192456.6M viewsView on X
  • Apr 4, 202435x their median

    I need someone to fill me like this rn!! https://t.co/wD7VP3LvuI

    88K11K379615.7M viewsView on X
  • May 8, 202632x their median

    Are u filling me up? Be honest wataa 😳 https://t.co/FjhOPeLdkP

    82K9.3K201112.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202623x their median

    thank you for treating us so well san diego 🫶 https://t.co/y3qM0K70CW

    65K1.5K1061241.8M viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 202621x their median

    will u cum inside me? 😳 be honest https://t.co/pjFh6OU0lT

    53K6.4K189121.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 202619x their median

    激キショ性癖教えてください。 まずはてめぇから

    50K1.2K1.2K1.7K12M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.8K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.198%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 4.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 211K interactions, about 74x its own typical post.

What is Baby🍓ONLY $4,80's engagement rate on X?
Baby🍓ONLY $4,80 (@littlebabe____) has an engagement rate of 0.198%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,439,431 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.198%, Baby🍓ONLY $4,80 sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @littlebabe____ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @littlebabe____ post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going