PlayerSells
Back to @amerix's profile

Eric engagement report

@amerix - 2.4M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.144%
of 2.4M followers
Per impression
2.62%
130K views on a typical post
Reach
5.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.079%
103 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 3.4K interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.144%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 130K times each, and 2.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5M interactions, about 444x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Eric's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.144%, Eric sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.046% to 0.318%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video46% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link8% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length-+12%+10% to +15%6.3K
  • 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 331 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 12% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 11, 2022444x their median

    My pronouns are Prosecute/Fauci

    1.2M186K92K34KView on X
  • Jul 29, 202653x their median

    The truth. https://t.co/nWMBrHOpHH 👀

    138K28K7.4K8.7K106M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202214x their median

    Here are 15 lessons I have learnt as a civil servant working for Government. Thread 🧵

    33K12K1.2K283View on X
  • Jul 10, 202413x their median

    If you are a Kenyan, You must have seen a sustained narrative claiming that your president and his deputy are at loggerheads. They are NOT. You must have heard that the president is persecuting his deputy just the same way the former president was at loggerheads with his deputy. They were not. Here is the thing, The system keeps you in a sustained political debate. This artificial conundrum is designed to distract you and vex your spirits. This debate is meant to sow divisions among citizens. The system thrives in confusion, division and distraction. Listen, The social stratum has the wealthy, the middle class and the poor. The poor are busy looking for survival, they have little time for political correctness. The wealthy are busy looking after their wealth by funding politicians to write legislation that will continue making them wealthier. The crux of the matter is in the middle class where you and I sit. These are the pawns of the game. They are educated but are idiots. They are the ones who go to the queue for voting.  (The poor don't vote unless induced by money). The middle class are the noise decibels. They are the donkeys that work hard to feed the rich. They are heavily taxed. They are the fools thrown into a heated circus to hate each other, create divisions and distract themselves. They claim to be learned but cannot decipher the political con game. The middle class are the ones with big televisions, smartphones and computers. It is here the rich pay the media to sow seeds of confusion and distraction. It is only a foolish Kenyan who thinks the political crooks from both ends of the political divide don't meet privately to laugh at how they have divided the masses. It is only a foolish citizen who thinks politicians serve them. They don't and will never. Politicians serve • The World Bank • World Economic Forum • IMF • USAID • UKAID • America • Britain Refuse to be drawn into imaginary conflicts. Focus on your goals. Mobilize your energies. Politicians won't save you. They are part of the problem. #DrainTheSwamp

    27K15K1.3K4531.5M viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 202110x their median

    Anthony Fauci should be in prison.

    29K4.8K489299View on X
  • Aug 1, 20237.4x their median

    5 lessons we can learn from Kenyan Comedian "Crazy Kennar" Thread 🧵 https://t.co/UJ2lUW8pad

    21K3.9K417762.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20227.2x their median

    Chaotic counties in Kenya - Meru - Machakos - Kirinyaga - Homa Bay - Kwale Premium tears will unfold in that order. Not my words. It's nature's design. Bookmark. #MashujaaDay

    18K5.1K966152View on X
  • Jul 23, 20247.0x their median

    The Parliament is a sacred place. But when citizens occupied it and some spilt blood or lost lives, — It became defiled and desecrated. But corrupt MPs do not respect the sanctity of parliament. They are immoral, greedy, arrogant, contemptuous, callous, and obstinate. Right from 25th June, no legislation passed in parliament will stand the test of moral piety. Any legislation passed will be an infraction against the soul of the nation. — Unless MPs repent and resign. MPs, together with their families, will suffer generational misfortune if they refuse to address the depth of the filth besmirching our nation. Once IEBC is properly constituted, all MPs should resign and seek a fresh mandate. Chaotic MPs and dunderheads like Passaris should be recalled and never voted back. Our parliament has been defiled by MPs. From receiving bribes in toilets, sexual immorality in offices, and disrespect towards the people. It must be cleansed. #DrainTheSwamp

    16K7.3K52987486K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20264.9x their median

    Albert Ojwang' was killed inside the police cells in police custody. No other way to say it. Black and white.

    14K2.6K11810236K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20214.5x their median

    As a MAN, No matter how tough your life has become, You have the potential to RECREATE yourself. A man can walk into a construction site to mix ballast & cement, then 6 months later, he’s the manager of two other construction sites. Be proud you are a MAN. #BetterTogether

    12K2.6K18836View on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.4K interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.144%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 130K times each, and 2.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5M interactions, about 444x its own typical post.

What is Eric's engagement rate on X?
Eric (@amerix) has an engagement rate of 0.144%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,371,509 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.144%, Eric sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @amerix have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @amerix post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going