Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔 engagement report
@RichardBouselli - 10.0K followers on X
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 59K interactions against 10.0K followers, an engagement rate of 593.3%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.1M times each, and 5.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11041.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 198K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔's engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 2 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 593.3%, Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔 sits above the 99th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 1% band, which runs 366.2% and above.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.001% |
| 25th percentile | 0.006% |
| 50th percentile | 0.046% |
| 75th percentile | 0.318% |
| 90th percentile | 2.67% |
| 99th percentile | 366.2% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | 0% | 14K |
| 01:00 UTC | +3% | 15K |
| 02:00 UTC | -1% | 14K |
| 03:00 UTC | -2% | 15K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 12K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 12K |
| 06:00 UTC | -7% | 13K |
| 07:00 UTC | -6% | 14K |
| 08:00 UTC | -7% | 16K |
| 09:00 UTC | -2% | 19K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 20K |
| 11:00 UTC | -2% | 22K |
| 12:00 UTC | -1% | 24K |
| 13:00 UTC | +1% | 27K |
| 14:00 UTC | -2% | 28K |
| 15:00 UTC | -1% | 30K |
| 16:00 UTC | -1% | 29K |
| 17:00 UTC | -1% | 28K |
| 18:00 UTC | +1% | 25K |
| 19:00 UTC | 0% | 23K |
| 20:00 UTC | 0% | 21K |
| 21:00 UTC | +1% | 19K |
| 22:00 UTC | +1% | 16K |
| 23:00 UTC | +1% | 15K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +9% | 56K |
| Monday | +8% | 72K |
| Tuesday | +1% | 93K |
| Wednesday | -4% | 77K |
| Thursday | -3% | 70K |
| Friday | -6% | 71K |
| Saturday | +2% | 62K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 95% of posts | +79% | +73% to +84% | 5.7K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -49% | -50% to -47% | 6.0K |
| Typical length | - | +12% | +10% to +15% | 6.3K |
- 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 315 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 12% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 12, 20263.3x their median
Yesterday I went to Minneapolis polls disguised as a Muslim woman. Poll workers were going to let me vote in other people’s names, and then vouch for 8 other unregistered foreigners. Full video coming soon. Stay tuned. @ctznjusticelg https://t.co/D1vumsGg1K
- Jul 13, 20262.3x their median
I will not be taking anymore questions... what happened happened. https://t.co/PcPqwn4ss0
- Jul 20, 20262.2x their median
If the Senate passes the SAVE America Act, I will cut my hair.
- Jul 14, 20262.1x their median
Requiring an ID and proof of citizenship to vote is common sense. It’s time to pass the SAVE America Act. RT if you agree.
- Jul 27, 20261.9x their median
James Woods ENDS John Thune’s Career With A Single Line For FAILING to Pass The SAVE America Act: ‘Who Owns You?’ "John Thune, my message is 'Who owns you?' Because you're not doing anything for the United States." "Who wants the SAVE America Act? 82% of Republicans and 75% of Democrats"
- Jul 23, 20261.9x their median
New York, how did you elect an Israel-hating, Muslim jihadist mayor 25 years after this? Have you lost your collective minds? https://t.co/i8uUCUza5l
- Aug 9, 20261.8x their median
Coach White chose to defend Sophie Cunningham’s attacker instead of Sophie Cunningham. There is no coming back from that. Fire her tomorrow. https://t.co/uIQrPikKRE
- Jul 23, 20261.8x their median
Liberal White Woman: "Some people loathe you. Do you understand why?" Elon: "Maybe some people do loathe me. That's probably true. I don't care. I think a lot more people hate you and the media than you realize." I love this man!!!!!! 🤣 https://t.co/DpsZ4suVC0
- Jul 20, 20261.6x their median
Good morning America. It’s a great day for deportations. https://t.co/pn8GofpOMZ
- Aug 16, 20261.6x their median
Your credit score didn’t exist before 1989. For 200 years Americans bought homes and cars without it. Then 3 private companies invented a number that now controls your entire financial life
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 59K interactions against 10.0K followers, an engagement rate of 593.3%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.1M times each, and 5.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11041.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 198K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.
- What is Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔's engagement rate on X?
- Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔 (@RichardBouselli) has an engagement rate of 593.3%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 9,990 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 593.3%, Things that make ya go Hmmm...🤔 sits above the 99th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RichardBouselli have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RichardBouselli post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.