PlayerSells
Back to @MAstronomers's profile

Curiosity engagement report

@MAstronomers - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.902%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
3.80%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
528
interactions (median)
Saved
0.073%
42 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 528 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.902% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 43x its own typical post.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Curiosity's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Curiosity sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,573 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.006% to 0.045%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.045%
p750.318%
p902.70%
p99370.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,573 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 462,938 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.045%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.70%
99th percentile370.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 107%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC+10%4.7K
01:00 UTC+7%4.6K
02:00 UTC+4%4.7K
03:00 UTC+4%4.6K
04:00 UTC+5%4.2K
05:00 UTC-2%4.2K
06:00 UTC-10%4.2K
07:00 UTC-3%4.7K
08:00 UTC-5%5.5K
09:00 UTC+7%6.1K
10:00 UTC+1%7.0K
11:00 UTC-3%7.6K
12:00 UTC-3%8.7K
13:00 UTC-1%10K
14:00 UTC-5%11K
15:00 UTC-6%12K
16:00 UTC-3%12K
17:00 UTC-4%11K
18:00 UTC+1%9.5K
19:00 UTC-2%8.7K
20:00 UTC-2%7.7K
21:00 UTC+5%6.6K
22:00 UTC+3%5.7K
23:00 UTC+7%4.7K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 107%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+18%25K
Monday+10%41K
Tuesday-24%42K
Wednesday+2%14K
Thursday0%16K
Friday0%19K
Saturday+16%22K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+53%+46% to +62%1.9K
Outbound link0% of posts-52%-54% to -49%2.2K
Typical length--8%-10% to -6%3.0K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 53% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 52% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 138 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 202643x their median

    Totality seen from 36,000 feet. https://t.co/vOBmxzBoTb

    20K3.2K3454339K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202635x their median

    Mars, sol 1932 captured by NASA's nuclear-powered rover. This is 140 million miles away from us! https://t.co/7Ip97Q3qog

    16K1.8K7221471.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202623x their median

    Remember how fast the Earth started to heal when we were all locked up during Covid? All we have to do is stop and we've already shown we can.

    11K92520324321K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202620x their median

    This is a Rocky appreciation post. That’s it. Love for Rocky. https://t.co/brWQAfxAvd

    9.8K6497527160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202612x their median

    What Night Sky on Mars may look like. https://t.co/mklLz3UYEj

    5.6K64315136163K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202611x their median

    Scotland just lost 600 hectares of an ancient forest that has stood since the ice sheets melted 9,000 years ago. The Cairngorms wildfire is still burning after 12 days. Yes, this is happening right now.

    4.4K1.2K12827144K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202610x their median

    On August 2, 1971, near the end of their final excursion on the Moon, Apollo 15 astronauts David Scott and James Irwin placed a memorial plaque on the lunar surface in honour of 14 deceased astronauts and cosmonauts. Beside it, they placed a small aluminium sculpture known as the Fallen Astronaut. The plaque bears the names of Charles Bassett II, Pavel Belyayev, Roger Chaffee, Georgi Dobrovolski, Theodore Freeman, Yuri Gagarin, Edward Givens Jr., Virgil Grissom, Vladimir Komarov, Viktor Patsayev, Elliot See Jr., Vladislav Volkov, Edward White II and Clifton Williams Jr.

    4.7K57119823227K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20268.6x their median

    Save it for the next person who tells you we’ve always had hot summers. https://t.co/dRyc0ykgao

    3.5K76329930115K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20267.2x their median

    Ah yes, the Mediterranean. Famous this decade for its idyllic wildfires, water rationing and 45°C summers. Sign me up. Quite possibly the stupidest argument ever committed to newsprint. What's next: Britain can't stop global crime. Scrap the police and embrace the Wild West. https://t.co/8pTbmmcQug

    2.9K6761742596K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20266.2x their median

    If covid shots were free to save lives then why isn't chemo free?.

    2.2K24949930615M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 528 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.902% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 43x its own typical post.

What is Curiosity's engagement rate on X?
Curiosity (@MAstronomers) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,540,421 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Curiosity sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,573 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MAstronomers have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MAstronomers post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going